Udio Allegedly Copied Copyrighted Sound Recordings Without Permission to Train Its Generative AI Models
Description
Record labels and independent artists alleged that Udio copied copyrighted recordings without permission and used them to train its generative music models. Udio acknowledged that its training data presumably included recordings owned by the plaintiffs but argued the copying was fair use. Plaintiffs alleged losses of licensing control and compensation and competition from AI-generated music.
Actors
Alleged Deployers
- uncharted-labs
- synthetic-media-generation-technology-developers
- synthetic-audio-generation-technology-developers
- ai-service-providers
- ai-music-generation-system-developers
Alleged Developers
- uncharted-labs
- synthetic-media-generation-technology-developers
- synthetic-audio-generation-technology-developers
- ai-music-generation-system-developers
Harmed Parties
- warner-music-group
- universal-music-group
- sony-music-entertainment
- songwriters
- record-labels
- musicians
- intellectual-property-rights-holders
- independent-artists
- copyright-holders
- tony-justice
- david-woulard
- stan-burjek
- james-burjek
- berk-ergoz
- hamza-jilani
- maatkara-wilson
- arjun-singh
- magnus-fiennes
- michael-mell