Incident #852·Misinformation
Alleged Fake Citations Undermine Expert Testimony in Minnesota Deepfake Law Case
Description
In a legal case defending Minnesota’s deepfake election misinformation law, Stanford misinformation expert Professor Jeff Hancock's affidavit allegedly cited non-existent academic sources, potentially generated by ChatGPT. The reportedly fabricated citations appear to have undermined the credibility of his testimony.
Actors
Alleged Deployers
- jeff-hancock
Alleged Developers
- openai
- chatgpt
Harmed Parties
- mary-franson
- keith-ellison
- jeff-hancock
- christopher-kohls
- chad-larson
Classification
Risk Domain
MisinformationRisk Subdomain
3.1. False or misleading information
MIT Risk Profile
AIUnintentionalPost-deployment
Source
Related Incidents (Misinformation)
View all →Research Papers on This Topic
Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature
450 citationsOct 2023
Why Language Models Hallucinate
371 citationsSep 2025
CIFAKE: Image Classification and Explainable Identification of AI-Generated Synthetic Images
283 citationsMar 2023
Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems
265 citationsFeb 2019