ExplainabilityTransparencyAccountabilitycs.AI
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Andreas Holzinger, Chris Biemann, Constantinos S. Pattichis, Douglas B. Kell
December 28, 2017
arXiv.org
995 citations
30 influential
Key Takeaways
-
Legal requirements are driving explainable AI adoption in medicine: The paper highlights that the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which entered into force on May 25, 2018, requires that AI decisions be "re-traceable on demand," making it legally difficult to deploy unexplainable "black-box" AI systems in medical applications without the ability to explain results when requested.
-
Medical AI systems need transparency despite impressive performance: While deep learning models have achieved remarkable results in medical applications and even exceeded human performance in some visual tasks, the paper emphasizes that their "black-box" nature—lacking explicit explanatory structures—creates a fundamental problem that must be addressed before widespread medical deployment.
-
Explainability is distinct from understanding the math: The paper clarifies an important distinction: even when researchers understand the underlying mathematical principles of AI models, this technical knowledge doesn't automatically make the systems explainable to doctors, patients, or regulators who need to understand why a specific medical decision was made.
-
Medical domain requires special considerations: The authors emphasize that medicine is "a very special domain" requiring tailored approaches to explainable AI, suggesting that solutions developed for other AI applications (like autonomous driving or game-playing) may not directly transfer to healthcare contexts where patient safety and trust are paramount.