EthicsPrivacyAccountabilitycs.CY
SECure: A Social and Environmental Certificate for AI Systems
Abhishek Gupta, Camylle Lanteigne, Sara Kingsley
June 11, 2020
arXiv.org
16 citations
Key Takeaways
-
AI systems have significant hidden environmental and social costs: The paper highlights that current AI applications consume substantial energy and require large amounts of data for training, creating an unsustainable carbon footprint and raising concerns about how user data is extracted and used.
-
Compressed AI models can maintain performance while reducing energy use: The framework proposes using "compressed network architectures that show marginal decreases in accuracy," suggesting that AI systems can operate more efficiently without substantially sacrificing their effectiveness—a practical path toward greener AI.
-
Distributing computation across existing devices reduces energy demand: Federated learning techniques can spread computational loads "across idle capacity on devices," meaning AI processing could leverage unused computing power already in homes and offices rather than requiring centralized, energy-intensive data centers.
-
Data privacy and user control should be built into AI systems: The framework incorporates "use-based privacy and differential privacy" techniques to protect user data, addressing concerns that current AI development often treats personal information as a resource to be extracted rather than protected.
-
Standardized certification could help consumers make responsible AI choices: Similar to LEED certification for buildings, a certification system for AI products would allow people to evaluate and compare the environmental and social impacts of different AI systems, enabling values-aligned purchasing decisions.