ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.CV
Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Survey
Arun Das, Paul Rad
June 16, 2020
arXiv.org
800 citations
40 influential
Key Takeaways
-
AI systems in high-stakes domains require transparency: The paper emphasizes that deep neural networks are increasingly deployed in mission-critical applications like healthcare, self-driving vehicles, and military systems that directly impact human lives, yet their "black-box nature" creates ethical and legal concerns that undermine public trust in these systems.
-
Explainable AI is a growing toolkit, not a single solution: XAI encompasses multiple tools, techniques, and algorithms rather than one approach, and the paper categorizes these methods by their scope, methodology, and explanation level—suggesting that different situations may require different explanation strategies.
-
The field is rapidly maturing with established principles: The survey documents a historical timeline of landmark XAI studies from 2007 to 2020, indicating that explainability research has developed established principles and methodologies that practitioners can draw upon when building trustworthy AI systems.
-
Evaluating explanations remains challenging: While the paper evaluates eight different XAI algorithms on image data, it acknowledges significant limitations in how we currently assess whether explanations are actually good, accurate, or useful—suggesting this is an area where responsible AI deployment still faces practical obstacles.
-
Trustworthy AI requires interpretability by design: The paper advocates for building AI systems that are "self-explanatory" from the ground up rather than treating explainability as an afterthought, positioning interpretability as essential to responsible deployment in sensitive domains.