ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.HC
EUCA: the End-User-Centered Explainable AI Framework
Weina Jin, Jianyu Fan, Diane Gromala, Philippe Pasquier, Ghassan Hamarneh
February 4, 2021
33 citations
1 influential
Key Takeaways
-
Non-technical explanations are essential but underexplored: The paper identifies that while explainability is critical for AI used in important decisions, most research focuses on technical audiences rather than the everyday people who actually use these systems.
-
Twelve practical explanation types work for non-experts: The framework identifies twelve explanation formats that don't require technical knowledge—including feature-based (showing which factors mattered), example-based (showing similar past cases), and rule-based explanations (showing decision logic)—providing practitioners with concrete options to choose from.
-
Different explanation types have different strengths: The user study with 32 layperson participants found that each explanation type has specific pros, cons, and works best for different goals, meaning there's no one-size-fits-all solution; designers must match explanation types to what users actually need to understand.
-
Co-design with real users reveals actual needs: By involving non-technical participants in prototyping, the research discovered what explanations actually help people make better decisions, rather than assuming what would work—a crucial distinction for responsible AI deployment.
-
Practical toolkit available for designers and developers: EUCA provides ready-to-use design templates, prototyping cards, and algorithms that AI practitioners can immediately apply to build more understandable AI systems, making responsible explainability more accessible to implement.