ExplainabilityTransparencyAccountabilitycs.AI
Principles of Explanation in Human-AI Systems
Shane T. Mueller, Elizabeth S. Veinott, Robert R. Hoffman, Gary Klein, Lamia Alam, Tauseef Mamun, William J. Clancey
February 9, 2021
arXiv.org
72 citations
9 influential
Key Takeaways
-
Algorithm-first approaches to explainability often fail users: The paper finds that many XAI systems are "algorithm-focused; starting and ending with an algorithm that implements a basic untested idea about explainability" without being tested to determine whether they actually help users accomplish their goals, meaning their explainability remains unproven.
-
Human needs should drive XAI design, not technical capabilities: Rather than building explanations around what algorithms can do, the authors advocate for starting with "human-focused principles for the design, testing, and implementation of XAI systems, and implement algorithms to serve that purpose"—a fundamental shift in how explainable AI should be developed.
-
Empowering user self-explanation is a key goal: The paper introduces the "Self-Explanation Scorecard" as a tool to help developers understand how to "empower users by enabling self-explanation," suggesting that effective XAI should help people explain AI decisions to themselves rather than simply providing pre-generated explanations.
-
Four decades of research provides guidance for responsible XAI: The authors draw on "basic concepts that have been used for user-centered XAI systems over the past 40 years of research" to develop "empirically-grounded, user-centered design principles," indicating that responsible AI explainability has established best practices that should be followed.