TrustworthinessSafetyTransparencycs.CY
Exploring the Assessment List for Trustworthy AI in the Context of Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems
Markus Borg, Joshua Bronson, Linus Christensson, Fredrik Olsson, Olof Lennartsson, Elias Sonnsjö, Hamid Ebabi, Martin Karsberg
March 4, 2021
Workshop on Ethics in Software Engineering Research and Practice
17 citations
1 influential
Key Takeaways
-
ALTAI provides a practical framework for real-world AI development: The paper demonstrates that the European Commission's Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (ALTAI)—which defines trustworthy AI as lawful, ethical, and robust—can be meaningfully applied to complex, safety-critical systems like Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems, offering developers concrete guidance for responsible AI implementation.
-
Not all trustworthiness requirements apply equally across domains: The researchers found that certain ALTAI requirements, particularly those focused on human agency and transparency, were less applicable to ADAS development, suggesting that responsible AI frameworks need flexibility and domain-specific tailoring rather than one-size-fits-all approaches.
-
Individual companies cannot solve systemic AI challenges alone: The study reveals that broader questions about societal and environmental impact of AI systems cannot be adequately addressed by a single ADAS supplier working in isolation, highlighting the need for industry-wide standards, regulation, and collaborative responsibility for trustworthy AI deployment.
-
AI governance frameworks need refinement for practical use: The authors recommend three specific improvements for future versions of ALTAI: incorporating life-cycle variants (different requirements at different development stages), enabling domain-specific adaptations, and removing redundant requirements—suggesting that even well-intentioned frameworks require iterative improvement based on real-world implementation experience.