PrivacyEthicsTransparencycs.CR
Is Downloading this App Consistent with my Values? Conceptualizing a Value-Centered Privacy Assistant
Sarah E. Carter
June 23, 2021
IFIP International Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society
2 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Privacy decisions reflect personal values, not just risk assessment: The paper reframes how we think about privacy choices—rather than viewing them as technical security decisions, they should be understood as expressions of what users care about (environmental protection, personal autonomy, etc.), which could lead to more meaningful privacy tools.
-
Current privacy notices fail because they don't account for different user types: The research identifies three distinct groups—privacy fundamentalists (highly concerned), privacy pragmatists (willing to trade privacy for benefits), and the privacy unconcerned—suggesting that one-size-fits-all privacy disclosures cannot effectively serve everyone's decision-making needs.
-
A "value-centered privacy assistant" could help users align app choices with their beliefs: The proposed tool would help users like those considering the OpenLitterMap app by connecting data practices to their personal values, though the paper notes this approach works best for privacy fundamentalists and may need context-specific adjustments for other user groups.
-
Real-world testing is needed before implementation: The author emphasizes that while the conceptual framework is promising, empirical research in actual settings is required to prove whether a value-centered privacy assistant would actually work and improve user decision-making in practice.