BiasEthicsAccountabilitycs.CY
The Role of Social Movements, Coalitions, and Workers in Resisting Harmful Artificial Intelligence and Contributing to the Development of Responsible AI
Susan von Struensee
July 11, 2021
Social Science Research Network
6 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Diverse coalitions across sectors are actively resisting harmful AI applications, including indigenous communities addressing data reliability issues, smart city stakeholders, and students—demonstrating that responsible AI development requires broad-based participation beyond technologists and corporations.
-
Biased and unethical assumptions embedded in AI algorithms risk becoming "locked in" without intervention, highlighting the urgent need for human oversight to prevent harmful systems from becoming entrenched in society before their problems are identified and corrected.
-
The financial incentives and ethics of AI investors and developers warrant public scrutiny, as the paper notes that "questionable ethics and values of those heavily investing in and profiting from AI are under global scrutiny"—suggesting that responsible AI requires accountability from those with economic interests in the technology.
-
Human judgment and wisdom remain essential to managing AI's societal impact, with the paper arguing that "our best human judgment is needed to contain AI's harmful impact," positioning human oversight as a critical safeguard rather than an obstacle to AI development.
-
Social movements and worker organizing play a vital role in shaping AI governance, indicating that responsible AI development cannot be left solely to technical experts or corporate decision-makers, but requires input from affected communities and organized collective action.