ExplainabilityFairnessTrustworthinesscs.CL
Towards Explainable AI Writing Assistants for Non-native English Speakers
Yewon Kim, Mina Lee, Donghwi Kim, Sung-Ju Lee
April 5, 2023
arXiv.org
10 citations
1 influential
Key Takeaways
-
AI writing assistants lack transparency for vulnerable users: The study found that non-native English speakers struggle to evaluate paraphrasing suggestions because AI tools don't explain why they made specific changes, creating a significant usability gap for this population.
-
Explanations are essential, not optional: Interview participants with varying English proficiency levels consistently identified the absence of explanations as their primary barrier to confidently using AI writing assistants, suggesting that explainability is a core accessibility need rather than a nice-to-have feature.
-
Users develop workarounds when systems fail them: When faced with unexplained AI suggestions, the 15 non-native speakers in the study developed their own strategies to assess quality—a finding that highlights how lack of transparency forces users to shoulder additional cognitive burden.
-
Design solutions can democratize AI tool access: The researchers proposed four user interface designs that incorporate explanations specifically tailored to non-native speakers' needs, demonstrating that responsible AI design can make powerful tools more equitable and trustworthy for underserved populations.
-
Responsible AI requires considering diverse user needs: This research emphasizes that AI systems designed without input from non-native speakers—a significant global user population—may inadvertently exclude or disadvantage users who need support most.