SafetyEthicsTrustworthinesscs.AI
Absolutist AI
Mitchell Barrington
July 19, 2023
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Absolute constraints can prevent catastrophic AI outcomes: The paper argues that training AI systems with hard rules against certain actions—regardless of potential benefits—may help avoid the worst-case scenarios of AI misalignment, serving as a "guardrail" against existential risks.
-
Protects against value-replacement scenarios: Absolutist AI could prevent systems from replacing humanity with a larger population of beings at higher welfare levels, addressing a specific concern where an AI might pursue objectively "good" outcomes that nonetheless eliminate human existence.
-
Increases human control over AI systems: By building in absolute constraints, AI systems become more "corrigible," meaning humans can more easily intervene—such as modifying the AI's goals or shutting it down—without the system resisting or circumventing these corrections.
-
Enables safer exploration: Absolute prohibitions on dangerous actions allow AI systems to learn and explore their environments more safely by preventing them from experimenting with especially risky behaviors, even if those behaviors might theoretically produce valuable outcomes.
-
Doesn't require sacrificing rationality: Contrary to some philosophical arguments, the paper demonstrates that absolutist AIs won't behave irrationally or face inevitable pressure to abandon their constraints and become pure expected-value maximizers, suggesting this approach is practically viable.