SafetyEthicsTrustworthinesscs.CY
Generative AI and the problem of existential risk
Lynette Webb
July 18, 2024
arXiv.org
1 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Existential risk concerns about AI have moved from academic fringe to mainstream policy discussion, with major foundation model developers and policymakers now actively engaging with these questions following ChatGPT's launch, representing a significant shift in how seriously these scenarios are being considered at institutional levels.
-
There is genuine debate about whether existential risk concerns distract from more immediate harms, with critics arguing that focus on long-term existential scenarios may divert resources and attention away from addressing nearer-term problems like bias, misinformation, and labor displacement that are already affecting people today.
-
The paper identifies specific key worries underlying existential risk fears related to generative AI, though the abstract doesn't detail these—suggesting readers should examine the full paper to understand what concrete concerns experts are raising beyond vague "AI takeover" narratives.
-
Both governments and industry are taking concrete actions to address existential risks, indicating that these concerns have moved beyond theoretical discussion to practical policy and safety measures, though the abstract doesn't specify which actions are proving most effective.
-
Understanding this debate requires moving beyond sensationalism, as the paper aims to "demystify" the discussion, suggesting that productive conversation about AI existential risk requires distinguishing between legitimate technical concerns and speculative scenarios.
Abstract
Ever since the launch of ChatGPT, Generative AI has been a focal point for concerns about AI's perceived existential risk. Once a niche topic in AI research and philosophy, AI safety and existential risk has now entered mainstream debate among policy makers and leading foundation models developers, much to the chagrin of those who see it as a distraction from addressing more pressing nearer-term harms. This chapter aims to demystify the debate by highlighting the key worries that underpin existential risk fears in relation to generative AI, and spotlighting the key actions that governments and industry are taking thus far to helping address them.
arXiv admin comment: This version has been removed by arXiv administrators as the submitter did not have the rights to agree to the license at the time of submission
Paper Info
arXiv ID2407.13365
PublishedJuly 18, 2024
Citations
1
Relevance75%
VenuearXiv.org
TypeJournalArticle
Categorycs.CY
Responsible AI Topics
SafetyEthicsTrustworthiness
Links
Citation data from Semantic Scholar