AccountabilityTransparencyTrustworthinessecon.GN
Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology
Mark Fenwick, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci
July 28, 2024
arXiv.org
27 citations
2 influential
Key Takeaways
-
Regulatory sandboxes can attract investment: The paper's empirical study found that jurisdictions adopting a more proactive approach to Fintech regulation through dynamic regulation mechanisms (like regulatory sandboxes) can attract greater investment, suggesting that thoughtful regulation need not stifle innovation.
-
Innovation ecosystems thrive on partnerships between established companies and startups: The research emphasizes that successful AI innovation ecosystems require creative collaborations between large corporations and AI-focused startups—a critical factor that is often overlooked in policy discussions about fostering AI development.
-
Dynamic regulation provides space for responsible innovation: Rather than choosing between strict regulation or a regulatory free-for-all, the paper identifies "dynamic regulation" as a middle path that creates designated spaces for responsible AI experimentation while maintaining oversight.
-
Investment signals ecosystem health: Greater investment serves a dual purpose—it both helps build functioning innovation ecosystems and signals to others that an ecosystem is well-developed, creating a positive feedback loop that benefits regions adopting these strategies.
-
Balancing multiple uncertainties requires strategic approaches: The paper acknowledges that businesses and regulators face enormous challenges due to AI's broad reach and uncertain future effects, making the combination of dynamic regulation and strong innovation ecosystems particularly important for managing these risks responsibly.