ExplainabilitySafetyTrustworthinesscs.HC
Integrating Explainable AI in Medical Devices: Technical, Clinical and Regulatory Insights and Recommendations
Dima Alattal, Asal Khoshravan Azar, Puja Myles, Richard Branson, Hatim Abdulhussein, Allan Tucker
May 10, 2025
arXiv.org
4 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Black box AI models pose safety risks in clinical settings: The paper emphasizes that the complexity of many AI and machine learning models makes it difficult to understand how they reach their predictions, raising significant concerns about their safe integration into healthcare where clinicians need to trust and verify AI-assisted decisions.
-
Explainability is essential for clinical decision support: The expert working group convened by the UK MHRA identified incorporating explainable AI methods as crucial for ensuring both the safety and trustworthiness of medical AI devices, suggesting that clinicians cannot safely rely on AI systems they cannot understand.
-
Clinician behavior with AI requires study and training: The paper reports findings from a pilot study investigating how clinicians actually interact with and behave around AI methods during diagnosis, indicating that adequate training for healthcare professionals is essential to address potential issues arising from AI integration.
-
Regulatory guidance is needed for responsible AI adoption: The involvement of the UK MHRA and the paper's focus on providing "insights and recommendations for safely adopting AI systems in healthcare settings" suggests that clear regulatory frameworks and stakeholder guidance are necessary to bridge the gap between AI capability and clinical safety requirements.
-
Multi-disciplinary collaboration is critical: The expert working group included healthcare professionals, regulators, and data scientists, reflecting the paper's implicit recommendation that responsible AI in medicine requires coordinated input from technical, clinical, and regulatory perspectives rather than siloed decision-making.