SafetyTrustworthinessAccountabilitycs.AI
A New Perspective On AI Safety Through Control Theory Methodologies
Lars Ullrich, Walter Zimmer, Ross Greer, Knut Graichen, Alois C. Knoll, Mohan Trivedi
June 30, 2025
IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems
5 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Control theory offers practical safety tools for AI systems: The paper argues that established safety analysis methods from control theory and engineering—disciplines that have managed complex systems for decades—can be directly applied to AI safety, particularly for real-world applications like autonomous vehicles and medical devices where failures have serious consequences.
-
The "data control" framework bridges AI and traditional engineering: By treating AI systems through a control theory lens, the paper proposes a new approach called "data control" that helps AI engineers adopt proven safety assurance practices from traditional engineering, creating a common language between AI developers and safety experts.
-
Current AI lacks adequate safety assurance for critical applications: The paper identifies a significant gap: while AI is increasingly deployed in safety-critical cyber-physical systems (like autonomous vehicles or industrial robots), these systems lack the rigorous safety guarantees that traditional engineering provides, making this interdisciplinary approach urgent.
-
A systematic, top-down safety analysis method is needed: Rather than ad-hoc safety measures, the paper advocates for a structured, generic foundation for analyzing and assuring AI safety that can be adapted to different AI systems and applications—similar to how traditional engineering uses standardized safety protocols.
-
Understanding how AI abstracts real-world data is key to safety: The paper emphasizes that AI safety depends on carefully analyzing how AI systems interpret and abstract data from the real world, suggesting that safety assurance should focus on validating this data interpretation process.