ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.AI
Beyond Black-Box AI: Interpretable Hybrid Systems for Dementia Care
Matthew JY Kang, Wenli Yang, Monica R Roberts, Byeong Ho Kang, Charles B Malpas
July 2, 2025
arXiv.org
3 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Black-box AI systems undermine clinical trust: Despite strong benchmark performance, standalone machine learning models and LLMs fail to provide transparent, actionable guidance that clinicians need. The paper notes that "standalone machine-learning models excel at pattern recognition but seldom provide actionable, interpretable guidance, eroding clinician trust," highlighting why high test scores don't translate to better patient care.
-
LLMs alone don't improve diagnostic outcomes: The review found that when physicians used LLMs as assistants, there was "no better diagnostic accuracy or speed," demonstrating that advanced AI technology doesn't automatically enhance clinical decision-making without proper integration into workflows.
-
Hybrid AI combining human expertise with machine learning shows promise: The paper identifies "hybrid approaches that combine statistical learning with expert rule-based knowledge" as more effective, citing examples like PEIRS and ATHENA-CDS systems that maintain interpretability while leveraging AI capabilities.
-
AI systems need to explain their reasoning, not just make predictions: Future AI tools should prioritize "explanatory coherence by linking predictions to clinically meaningful causes" rather than simply outputting recommendations, making it possible for clinicians to understand and verify AI suggestions.
-
Clinician involvement throughout development is essential: The paper emphasizes that involving healthcare professionals in the design process helps ensure AI systems "fit better with existing clinical workflows" and address real clinical needs rather than theoretical performance metrics.