TrustworthinessFairnessBiascs.LG
CaTE Data Curation for Trustworthy AI
Mary Versa Clemens-Sewall, Christopher Cervantes, Emma Rafkin, J. Neil Otte, Tom Magelinski, Libby Lewis, Michelle Liu, Dana Udwin, Monique Kirkman-Bey
August 20, 2025
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Data curation is a critical phase for trustworthiness: The report identifies the data curation phase as a key opportunity for development teams to actively promote trustworthiness in AI systems, suggesting that trustworthy AI cannot be achieved through model design alone.
-
A structured, sequential approach exists: The authors provide a series of core steps that data scientists and development teams can follow during data curation, with documented strengths, weaknesses, and preconditions for each step, making trustworthiness a systematic rather than ad-hoc process.
-
Multiple pathways accommodate different contexts: The report traces parallel paths where alternatives exist in the data curation process, recognizing that different AI projects may have different constraints and requirements while still pursuing trustworthiness.
-
Practical tools are available and documented: The guidance includes implementations using open-source software tools, making the recommended practices accessible to development teams rather than purely theoretical.
-
Trustworthiness requires intentional definition and planning: The report begins by defining both "data curation" and "trustworthiness" explicitly, emphasizing that teams must clarify what trustworthiness means for their specific AI system before implementing curation practices.