AccountabilityExplainabilityTransparencycs.AI
Human-Centered LLM-Agent System for Detecting Anomalous Digital Asset Transactions
Gyuyeon Na, Minjung Park, Hyeonjeong Cha, Sangmi Chai
October 23, 2025
arXiv.org
1 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Human-centered design improves trust in AI decision-making: HCLA demonstrates that allowing non-experts to express their analytical intent in natural language and inspect the reasoning process step-by-step substantially improves interpretability and decision transparency compared to traditional black-box models, suggesting that involving humans in the AI workflow—rather than just explaining outputs—builds confidence in high-stakes decisions.
-
Separating evidence from justification enhances accountability: The system's explicit separation of evidence scoring (what the data shows) from expert-style justification (how experts interpret that data) creates a clearer audit trail, which is critical for regulatory compliance and financial forensics where decision-makers need to understand not just what the AI flagged, but why it matters in context.
-
Explainability alone is insufficient for responsible AI in finance: The paper emphasizes that HCLA goes "beyond explainability" to focus on accountability and regulatory judgment, suggesting that in sensitive domains like financial crime detection, simply explaining a model's predictions is not enough—systems must align algorithmic evidence with real-world investigative and compliance standards.
-
Open-source, transparent tools support responsible deployment: By implementing HCLA as an open-source, web-based interface rather than a proprietary black box, the authors demonstrate a practical commitment to transparency and auditability, making it easier for regulators and institutions to scrutinize how AI systems make consequential decisions about financial transactions.
-
Classical methods with human oversight may outperform pure AI automation: The finding that combining traditional anomaly detectors with human-centered reasoning produces better outcomes than the detector alone suggests that responsible AI in high-stakes domains may require hybrid approaches rather than fully automated decision-making.