ExplainabilityTransparencyAccountabilitycs.CV
Reasoning Visual Language Model for Chest X-Ray Analysis
Andriy Myronenko, Dong Yang, Baris Turkbey, Mariam Aboian, Sena Azamat, Esra Akcicek, Hongxu Yin, Pavlo Molchanov, Marc Edgar, Yufan He, Pengfei Guo, Yucheng Tang, Daguang Xu
October 28, 2025
arXiv.org
9 citations
1 influential
Key Takeaways
-
Explicit reasoning improves clinical trust and safety: In a reader study with expert radiologists, providing full reasoning traces (showing step-by-step thinking) increased clinician confidence in the AI system and reduced time needed to finalize reports, demonstrating that transparency about how an AI reaches conclusions matters as much as accuracy.
-
AI can be trained to mirror expert thinking, not just outcomes: The model was trained using a two-stage approach (supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning) specifically designed to learn how radiologists reason through cases systematically, including their consideration of alternative diagnoses and acknowledgment of uncertainty—moving beyond black-box predictions.
-
Interpretability enables meaningful error auditing: The reasoning traces reveal not just what the model concluded, but why it reached that conclusion, which alternatives it considered, and where it remained uncertain. This transparency supports quality assurance and helps identify where and why errors occur, rather than treating failures as unexplainable.
-
The approach maintains competitive accuracy while adding transparency: The model achieved strong multi-label classification performance on chest X-rays even when evaluated on out-of-distribution data, showing that building in interpretability doesn't require sacrificing diagnostic accuracy.
-
Open release supports responsible AI development: By releasing both the code and model (NV-Reason-CXR-3B), the authors are enabling broader community research into interpretable medical AI, rather than keeping the approach proprietary.