ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.AI
Proceedings of The third international workshop on eXplainable AI for the Arts (XAIxArts)
Corey Ford, Elizabeth Wilson, Shuoyang Zheng, Gabriel Vigliensoni, Jeba Rezwana, Lanxi Xiao, Michael Clemens, Makayla Lewis, Drew Hemment, Alan Chamberlain, Helen Kennedy, Nick Bryan-Kinns
November 13, 2025
arXiv.org
1 citations
Key Takeaways
I appreciate your interest, but I need to be transparent: the text you've provided is only a title and abstract for a workshop proceedings, not a full research paper with specific findings or data.
To provide accurate takeaways for a non-technical audience, I would need:
- The actual papers or research presented at the workshop
- Specific findings, case studies, or conclusions from those papers
- Data or evidence supporting key points
What I can note from the abstract alone:
- This workshop focuses on making AI systems more understandable (explainable) specifically in artistic and creative contexts
- It brings together diverse experts (HCI designers, artists, AI researchers) suggesting responsible AI in arts requires interdisciplinary collaboration
- The fact that this is a third international workshop suggests growing recognition that AI transparency matters in creative fields
If you have access to the full workshop papers or proceedings, I'd be happy to extract meaningful takeaways with proper citations. Alternatively, if you're looking for general principles about explainable AI in creative applications, I can discuss those—but I want to avoid fabricating specific findings that aren't in the source material.
Abstract
This third international workshop on explainable AI for the Arts (XAIxArts) brought together a community of researchers in HCI, Interaction Design, AI, explainable AI (XAI), and digital arts to explore the role of XAI for the Arts. Workshop held at the 17th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C 2025), online.