ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.CV
EchoAgent: Guideline-Centric Reasoning Agent for Echocardiography Measurement and Interpretation
Matin Daghyani, Lyuyang Wang, Nima Hashemi, Bassant Medhat, Baraa Abdelsamad, Eros Rojas Velez, XiaoXiao Li, Michael Y. C. Tsang, Christina Luong, Teresa S. M. Tsang, Purang Abolmaesumi
November 17, 2025
arXiv.org
4 citations
Key Takeaways
-
AI systems can be designed to follow clinical guidelines explicitly: EchoAgent demonstrates that AI tools can be built to align with established medical protocols rather than operating as "black boxes." The system grounds its outputs in both visual evidence and clinical guidelines, making its reasoning traceable and verifiable by clinicians.
-
Specialized tools improve reliability in complex medical tasks: Rather than using a single general-purpose model, EchoAgent orchestrates multiple specialized vision tools (for temporal localization, spatial measurement, and interpretation) under LLM control. This modular approach achieved accurate results despite the added complexity of analyzing video data rather than static images.
-
Knowing when NOT to measure is as important as measuring: A key innovation was a "measurement-feasibility prediction model" that determines whether anatomical structures can be reliably measured in each frame. This autonomous tool selection prevents the system from making measurements when conditions are inadequate—a critical safety feature for clinical deployment.
-
Transparency and traceability are achievable in AI-assisted diagnosis: The paper emphasizes that EchoAgent's outputs are "grounded in visual evidence and clinical guidelines, supporting transparency and traceability." This addresses a major concern in responsible AI: clinicians can understand why the system made specific recommendations, enabling meaningful human oversight.
-
Domain-specific AI requires domain-specific evaluation: The authors curated a benchmark of "diverse, clinically validated video-query pairs" rather than relying on generic datasets, highlighting that responsible AI deployment in medicine requires evaluation methods tailored to real clinical workflows and validated by domain experts.