ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.NI
XAI-on-RAN: Explainable, AI-native, and GPU-Accelerated RAN Towards 6G
Osman Tugay Basaran, Falko Dressler
October 7, 2025
arXiv.org
3 citations
1 influential
Key Takeaways
-
AI in critical infrastructure requires transparency: The paper argues that as AI becomes central to mission-critical systems like autonomous vehicles, remote healthcare, and industrial automation, the "opacity of AI decisions poses risks" that demand explainable AI (XAI) solutions rather than black-box models.
-
Explainability involves real trade-offs: The research identifies a mathematical framework showing that transparency, latency, and computational efficiency are competing priorities—meaning organizations cannot maximize all three simultaneously when deploying AI in 6G networks, requiring deliberate design choices.
-
Hybrid approaches can improve performance: The paper's proposed "xAI-Native" hybrid model "consistently surpasses conventional baseline models in performance," suggesting that combining explainability with AI optimization doesn't necessarily sacrifice accuracy or speed.
-
Non-public networks demand higher standards: The paper emphasizes that dedicated network slices for specific industries (like healthcare or industrial automation) have heightened reliability and safety requirements, making explainability particularly critical in these controlled, high-stakes environments rather than just public networks.
-
6G design must prioritize trustworthiness from the start: Rather than treating explainability as an afterthought, the paper advocates for "AI-native" architecture that builds transparency into next-generation networks from the ground up, aligned with 3GPP standards for responsible network design.