EthicsAccountabilityTransparencycs.CY
The Hidden AI Race: Tracking Environmental Costs of Innovation
Shyam Agarwal, Mahasweta Chakraborti
November 27, 2025
arXiv.org
4 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Larger AI models and frequent updates significantly increase carbon emissions: The research found that model size and how often models are versioned (updated) are strongly correlated with higher environmental costs, suggesting that bigger isn't always better when considering sustainability.
-
Different types of AI have vastly different environmental impacts: Natural language processing (NLP) models like those used in chatbots produce lower carbon footprints compared to audio-based AI systems, indicating that the choice of AI domain matters substantially for environmental responsibility.
-
University-led AI projects currently have the highest emissions: Contrary to what some might expect, university-driven AI research projects showed the highest carbon footprints, followed by non-profits and companies, while community-driven projects demonstrated lower emissions—raising questions about resource efficiency in academic AI development.
-
Organizational structure influences environmental impact: The type of organization developing AI (university, company, non-profit, or community) significantly affects how much carbon is produced, suggesting that different sectors may need tailored approaches to reduce their AI-related environmental costs.
-
Practical solutions exist for greener AI development: The paper identifies concrete practices to reduce AI's environmental footprint, including using energy-efficient architectures, optimizing development workflows, and transitioning to renewable energy sources for AI training and deployment.
Abstract
The past decade has seen a massive rise in the popularity of AI systems, mainly owing to the developments in Gen AI, which has revolutionized numerous industries and applications. However, this progress comes at a considerable cost to the environment as training and deploying these models consume significant computational resources and energy and are responsible for large carbon footprints in the atmosphere. In this paper, we study the amount of carbon dioxide released by models across different domains over varying time periods. By examining parameters such as model size, repository activity (e.g., commits and repository age), task type, and organizational affiliation, we identify key factors influencing the environmental impact of AI development. Our findings reveal that model size and versioning frequency are strongly correlated with higher emissions, while domain-specific trends show that NLP models tend to have lower carbon footprints compared to audio-based systems. Organizational context also plays a significant role, with university-driven projects exhibiting the highest emissions, followed by non-profits and companies, while community-driven projects show a reduction in emissions. These results highlight the critical need for green AI practices, including the adoption of energy-efficient architectures, optimizing development workflows, and leveraging renewable energy sources. We also discuss a few practices that can lead to a more sustainable future with AI, and we end this paper with some future research directions that could be motivated by our work. This work not only provides actionable insights to mitigate the environmental impact of AI but also poses new research questions for the community to explore. By emphasizing the interplay between sustainability and innovation, our study aims to guide future efforts toward building a more ecologically responsible AI ecosystem.
Paper Info
arXiv ID2511.22781
PublishedNovember 27, 2025
Citations
4
Relevance75%
VenuearXiv.org
TypeJournalArticle
Categorycs.CY
Responsible AI Topics
EthicsAccountabilityTransparency
Links
Citation data from Semantic Scholar