ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.CV
XAI-CLIP: ROI-Guided Perturbation Framework for Explainable Medical Image Segmentation in Multimodal Vision-Language Models
Thuraya Alzubaidi, Sana Ammar, Maryam Alsharqi, Islem Rekik, Muzammil Behzad
February 1, 2026
arXiv.org
1 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Explainability is crucial for clinical adoption: The paper identifies limited interpretability of advanced AI models as a "major obstacle to clinical trust and deployment" in medical imaging, highlighting that superior performance alone is insufficient without the ability to explain how AI systems reach their conclusions.
-
New method dramatically improves efficiency: XAI-CLIP achieves up to 60% reduction in runtime compared to conventional explanation methods, addressing a practical barrier to implementing explainability techniques in time-sensitive clinical workflows where computational speed matters.
-
Language-guided AI produces more clinically relevant explanations: By incorporating vision-language model embeddings to identify anatomically meaningful regions, the framework generates "cleaner and more anatomically consistent attribution maps," suggesting that combining different types of AI knowledge (visual and textual) produces explanations doctors can better trust and act upon.
-
Quantifiable improvements in explanation quality: The method shows a 44.6% improvement in dice score and 96.7% increase in Intersection-over-Union for explanations, demonstrating that explainability techniques can be rigorously measured and compared—important for validating which explanation methods are most reliable.
-
Addresses real limitations of existing XAI approaches: The paper identifies that current explanation methods are "computationally expensive," require "numerous forward passes," and produce "noisy or anatomically irrelevant explanations," suggesting responsible AI deployment requires not just explaining decisions but explaining them efficiently and accurately.