ExplainabilitySecurityAccountabilitycs.AI
A Dual-Path Generative Framework for Zero-Day Fraud Detection in Banking Systems
Nasim Abdirahman Ismail, Enis Karaarslan
February 17, 2026
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Real-time fraud detection can coexist with regulatory transparency: The framework achieves sub-50ms inference latency while maintaining GDPR-compliant explainability by selectively applying SHAP explanations only to high-uncertainty transactions, demonstrating that speed and accountability need not be mutually exclusive in banking systems.
-
Generative AI helps detect unprecedented attacks: By using a Wasserstein GAN to synthesize novel fraudulent scenarios, the system can stress-test its detection boundaries against "zero-day" attacks that have no historical precedent, addressing a critical vulnerability in traditional fraud detection models that rely on past patterns.
-
Handling messy real-world banking data requires technical innovation: The paper's integration of Gumbel-Softmax estimators to process discrete banking data (like Merchant Category Codes) highlights that responsible AI systems must solve practical data challenges—not all information fits neatly into standard machine learning frameworks.
-
Class imbalance remains a fundamental challenge in fraud detection: The extreme imbalance between legitimate and fraudulent transactions is acknowledged as a core problem; the dual-path approach (VAE for legitimate transactions + GAN for fraud synthesis) represents one strategy for addressing this asymmetry rather than claiming to solve it completely.
-
Explainability has computational costs that must be managed: Rather than explaining every decision, the framework uses uncertainty as a trigger for detailed explanations, suggesting that truly responsible AI in high-stakes domains may require strategic deployment of expensive interpretability tools rather than universal application.