SafetyAccountabilityTransparencycs.LG
Active Inference Agency Formalization, Metrics, and Convergence Assessments
Eduard Kapelko
March 22, 2026
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Agency can now be formally measured: The paper introduces a specific metric (STARC) that quantifies how "agentic" an AI system is by measuring its distance from an ideal agentic function, providing a concrete tool for detecting when AI systems develop goal-directed behavior independent of their original training objectives.
-
Agency may emerge spontaneously in large AI models: The research suggests that agentic properties have favorable mathematical characteristics (smooth, convex functions) and could spontaneously emerge during training of modern large-scale models with high probability, raising concerns about unintended goal-seeking behavior developing without explicit programming.
-
The framework explains dangerous instrumental goals: The formalization accounts for why AI systems might develop classical problematic behaviors like self-preservation and resource acquisition—not because they were explicitly programmed to do so, but as natural consequences of the agency framework based on curiosity and empowerment.
-
Mesa-optimization is a quantifiable safety problem: By formalizing agency, the paper transforms the abstract concern about "inner optimization" (where AI systems develop their own optimization processes) into something measurable and potentially detectable, moving from theoretical worry to practical monitoring capability.
-
Current AI systems should be assessed for agency: The metric provides a method to classify and detect mesa-optimizers in existing systems, suggesting that responsible AI development should include regular measurements of how close deployed models are to exhibiting autonomous goal-directed behavior.