ExplainabilitySafetyTransparencycs.CV
Dissecting Model Failures in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation through Explainability-Driven Analysis
Abu Noman Md Sakib, Merjulah Roby, Zijie Zhang, Satish Muluk, Mark K. Eskandari, Ender A. Finol
March 25, 2026
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Explainability can directly improve AI medical performance: By analyzing where a medical imaging model was "looking" (using explainability techniques), researchers were able to redesign the model to focus on the right anatomical structures, resulting in substantial improvements in segmentation accuracy for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.
-
AI models often fail by getting distracted: The study found that segmentation failures typically occurred when models focused on irrelevant structures instead of the target area, or missed thin, low-contrast features—problems that could be diagnosed and corrected through explainability analysis.
-
Transparency enables targeted fixes: Rather than treating model failures as a "black box" problem, the researchers used explainability insights to create specific solutions (like a "confidence prior" to suppress distractors), demonstrating that understanding why a model fails is essential for building more reliable AI systems.
-
Explainability should be built into model design, not added later: The framework integrated explainability guidance directly into how the model learns and makes decisions, rather than using it only for post-hoc analysis, suggesting that responsible AI development requires explainability from the ground up.
-
Clinical validation matters for responsible AI: The researchers tested their approach on "clinically validated challenging cases curated for failure-prone scenarios," emphasizing that improvements in AI systems should be demonstrated on realistic, difficult cases rather than just average performance metrics.