ExplainabilityTransparencyAccountabilitycs.LG
A Regression Framework for Understanding Prompt Component Impact on LLM Performance
Andrew Lauziere, Jonathan Daugherty, Taisa Kushner
March 27, 2026
arXiv.org
1 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Prompt components significantly influence LLM performance: Regression models analyzing individual prompt features explained 72-77% of the variation in how well two open-source models (Mistral-7B and GPT-OSS-20B) performed on arithmetic tasks, demonstrating that prompt design is a critical factor in model outcomes.
-
Incorrect examples actively harm model performance: The study found that including false example query-answer pairs in prompts substantially impeded both models from solving arithmetic problems, suggesting that data quality in prompts matters as much as quantity.
-
Positive instructions show inconsistent effects: Interestingly, positive instructions did not produce consistent improvements across models, and contradictory instructions had unpredictable effects on performance—highlighting that prompt engineering is not straightforward and requires careful testing.
-
Statistical analysis can reveal how LLMs use prompts: This regression framework provides a practical tool for organizations to understand exactly which components of a prompt influence model behavior, enabling more informed decisions about prompt design in high-stakes applications.
-
Transparency into model decision-making is achievable: By breaking down prompts into measurable components and analyzing their individual impact, this approach contributes to making LLM behavior more interpretable and auditable—important for responsible deployment in critical scenarios.