ExplainabilityTransparencyTrustworthinesscs.CL
NyayaMind- A Framework for Transparent Legal Reasoning and Judgment Prediction in the Indian Legal System
Parjanya Aditya Shukla, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Debtanu Datta, Balaramamahanthi Deepak Patnaik, Noel Shallum, Pradeep Reddy Vanga, Saptarshi Ghosh, Arnab Bhattacharya
April 10, 2026
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Transparency through structured reasoning: NyayaMind generates legal decisions by breaking down the judicial process into distinct components (issues, arguments, rationale, and final decision), mirroring how courts actually reason rather than producing unexplainable "black box" predictions.
-
Evidence-grounded explanations matter: The framework significantly improves "evidence alignment" by retrieving and citing relevant statutes and precedent cases, meaning users can verify why a prediction was made by checking the actual legal sources cited—a critical requirement for trustworthy AI in high-stakes legal contexts.
-
Domain-specific AI performs better: The system uses language models specifically fine-tuned for Indian law rather than generic AI models, demonstrating that responsible legal AI requires specialized training on relevant legal systems and practices rather than one-size-fits-all approaches.
-
Expert validation is essential: The paper emphasizes that improvements were validated through "expert evaluation," highlighting that AI systems affecting judicial decisions cannot rely solely on automated metrics—legal professionals must assess whether the reasoning is actually sound and useful.
-
Open-source design supports accountability: By releasing NyayaMind as open-source, the framework enables legal experts, researchers, and policymakers to inspect, audit, and improve the system, rather than relying on proprietary "black box" legal AI tools.