TrustworthinessSafetyTransparencycs.MM
AVID: A Benchmark for Omni-Modal Audio-Visual Inconsistency Understanding via Agent-Driven Construction
Zixuan Chen, Depeng Wang, Hao Lin, Li Luo, Ke Xu, Ya Guo, Huijia Zhu, Tanfeng Sun, Xinghao Jiang
April 15, 2026
arXiv.org
4 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Current AI systems struggle to detect when audio and video don't match, which is a basic human skill—the paper shows that state-of-the-art multimodal AI models perform poorly at identifying these cross-modal conflicts, a critical gap for trustworthy AI systems that need to recognize inconsistencies like mismatched speech or misleading combinations of sound and visuals.
-
The benchmark includes 11.2K videos with nearly 40,000 documented instances of audio-visual mismatches, providing researchers with a substantial dataset to test and improve AI systems' ability to spot inconsistencies across eight different types of conflicts, from deepfakes to voiceover misalignments.
-
Even advanced AI models fail at temporal grounding tasks, meaning they cannot accurately pinpoint when inconsistencies occur in videos—the best model achieved only 36.1% accuracy on this task, suggesting current systems cannot reliably tell users where problems exist in video content.
-
Specialized training significantly improves performance, with a fine-tuned model (AVID-Qwen) showing 2.8 times better results than the base model on reasoning tasks, indicating that targeted development could help AI systems better detect manipulated or misleading video content.
-
This work addresses a critical gap in AI safety: while existing benchmarks focus on aligned content or obvious deepfakes, this benchmark evaluates AI's ability to understand subtle, real-world inconsistencies in long-form videos—essential for preventing misinformation and ensuring AI systems can identify when content may be deceptive.