PrivacySafetyTransparencycs.CL
Measuring the Depth of LLM Unlearning via Activation Patching
Jaeung Lee, Dohyun Kim, Jaemin Jo
May 23, 2026
arXiv.org
1 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Current unlearning audits are insufficient: Existing methods that only check what an AI model outputs fail to detect when unwanted knowledge remains hidden in the model's internal representations—a critical gap for privacy and safety assurance.
-
A new measurement tool reveals hidden knowledge: The Unlearning Depth Score (UDS) uses "activation patching" to examine a model's internal layers and measure whether target knowledge has truly been erased, outperforming 19 other metrics across 150 tested models.
-
Knowledge can appear erased while remaining recoverable: The research found that representational shifts can mask residual knowledge—meaning a model might seem to have forgotten something based on its outputs, but the information is still mechanistically present and potentially recoverable.
-
Erasure depth varies by context: The study revealed that how thoroughly knowledge is erased depends on the specific type of prompt or question asked, suggesting that unlearning effectiveness is not uniform across different usage scenarios.
-
Standardized evaluation is now possible: By providing generalizable guidelines for integrating UDS into existing benchmarking frameworks, this work enables more consistent and reliable auditing of whether AI systems have genuinely forgotten sensitive information—essential for responsible deployment.