ExplainabilityAccountabilityTransparencycs.CV
Local Label-Informed Feature Transfer for Generating Ground-Truth Medical Images: A Comparison of GAN- and Diffusion-Based Approaches
Rick Wilming, Irem Ozseker, Luca Matteo Cornils, Ahcène Boubekki, Benedict Clark, Danny Panknin, Stefan Haufe
July 21, 2026
arXiv.org
Key Takeaways
-
Synthetic medical images can help validate AI explanations without manual annotation burden: LLIFT generates realistic brain lesions in controlled locations without requiring pixel-level expert annotations during training, addressing a major bottleneck in creating ground-truth datasets for testing Explainable AI methods.
-
Two different AI approaches (GANs and diffusion models) both produced clinically realistic results: Both LLIFT-GAN and LLIFT-DM achieved quality scores comparable to the difference between real healthy and diseased images, suggesting multiple technical pathways can generate trustworthy synthetic medical data.
-
Semi-synthetic data could improve AI validation practices: By creating images with known, precisely-located lesions, researchers can better test whether XAI methods correctly identify which image features AI systems actually use for diagnosis—a critical step in ensuring medical AI systems are trustworthy.
-
This approach reduces reliance on expert labeling, which introduces human error: The framework avoids the accuracy problems inherent in having radiologists manually mark lesion locations, potentially making AI validation more scalable and consistent across institutions.
-
Realistic synthetic lesions matter more than artificial ones for testing AI systems: The paper demonstrates that hand-crafted artificial lesions lack clinical realism, so using AI-generated lesions that mimic actual pathology provides a more rigorous test of whether XAI methods work in real-world medical contexts.