SafetySecurityTrustworthinesscs.RO
From bits to atoms: A survey of cross-layer safety in Embodied AI
Tuo Feng, Yue Zhang, Shiji Zhou, Zhaoxin Fan, Wenguan Wang, Xiaowei Chi, Tianyu Shen, Xiangtai Li, Xuesong Bai, Zheng Zhu, Sirui Han, Boyu Zhou, Zhaosong Wang, Shizhe Chen, Zilong Zheng, Chenjia Bai, Jiangmiao Pang, Yaodong Yang, Hao Zhao, Di Hu, Li Yi, Yan Huang, Qi Wu, Hanwang Zhang, Fei Gao, Shanghang Zhang, Hongsheng Li, Jianye Hao, Yuan Zhang, Yingjie Xia, Jian Shen, Cewu Lu, Hui Zhang, Kai Chen, Wenwu Yu, Badong Chen, Jungong Han, Yike Guo
October 2, 2026
AI Plus
1 citations
Key Takeaways
-
Physical harm is a unique risk for AI systems that interact with the real world: Unlike traditional software, failures in embodied AI (robots, autonomous vehicles, etc.) can directly cause physical injury or damage because digital errors propagate from "bits to atoms." The survey identifies how vulnerabilities at any layer—from cloud data systems to physical actuators—can cascade across the system to produce real-world harm.
-
Safety requires coordinated defense across the entire system stack, not just the algorithm: The paper emphasizes that protecting embodied AI demands attention to four interconnected layers (physical interaction, system/middleware, algorithm/decision, and cloud-edge/data). A single weak point—whether a compromised sensor, unpatched software, or insecure data connection—can undermine safety across the entire system, meaning piecemeal solutions are insufficient.
-
Attacks can chain together across system boundaries in dangerous ways: The survey systematizes how attackers can exploit multiple vulnerabilities in sequence to cause physical harm. This means security assessments must consider not just individual component failures, but how failures in one layer (e.g., a cloud data breach) could enable attacks that manifest as dangerous physical behavior.
-
Current safety approaches need to bridge the gap between software alignment and hardware constraints: The paper advocates for unifying AI alignment efforts (ensuring systems behave as intended) with rigorous physical safety engineering. This suggests responsible embodied AI requires collaboration between AI researchers and traditional safety engineers rather than siloed approaches.
Abstract
Embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) introduces cyber-physical risks because digital failures and attacks can cause physical harm. This survey organizes embodied AI safety through a four-layer reference architecture -- comprising the physical interaction, system and middleware, algorithm and decision, and cloud-edge and data layers -- and uses it to connect vulnerabilities, propagation paths, and safeguards across the system stack. It traces the evolution of safety paradigms and examines how faults and attacks cross architectural boundaries to produce physical consequences. Furthermore, the survey systematizes composite attack chains, outlines multi-layered defense strategies, and reviews representative embodied safety benchmarks. Ultimately, we advocate for unifying software alignment with rigorous hardware constraints to build trustworthy systems capable of operating safely within human-centric environments.
Review article published in AI Plus. 25 pages, 6 figures. URL: https://www.the-innovation.org/ai-plus/article/doi/10.59717/ipj.aiplus.2026.100013
Paper Info
arXiv ID2610.14038
PublishedOctober 2, 2026
Citations
1
Relevance92%
VenueAI Plus
TypeJournalArticle, Review
Categorycs.RO
Responsible AI Topics
SafetySecurityTrustworthiness
Links
Citation data from Semantic Scholar