Research Papers

Foundation models have transformed multimedia analysis by enabling robust and transferable representations across diverse modalities and tasks. However, their static deployment conflicts with growing societal and regulatory demands -- particularly the need to unlearn specific data upon request, as mandated by privacy frameworks such as the GDPR. Traditional unlearning approaches, including retraining, activation editing, or distillation, are often computationally expensive, fragile, and ill-suited for real-time or continuously evolving systems. In this paper, we propose a paradigm shift: rethinking unlearning not as a retroactive intervention but as a built-in capability. We introduce a prompt-based learning framework that unifies knowledge acquisition and removal within a single training phase. Rather than encoding information in model weights, our approach binds class-level semantics to dedicated prompt tokens. This design enables instant unlearning simply by removing the corresponding prompt -- without retraining, model modification, or access to original data. Experiments demonstrate that our framework preserves predictive performance on retained classes while effectively erasing forgotten ones. Beyond utility, our method exhibits strong privacy and security guarantees: it is resistant to membership inference attacks, and prompt removal prevents any residual knowledge extraction, even under adversarial conditions. This ensures compliance with data protection principles and safeguards against unauthorized access to forgotten information, making the framework suitable for deployment in sensitive and regulated environments. Overall, by embedding removability into the architecture itself, this work establishes a new foundation for designing modular, scalable and ethically responsive AI models.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integral to various domains, their potential to generate harmful responses has prompted significant societal and regulatory concerns. In response, governments have issued ethics guidelines to promote the development of trustworthy AI. However, these guidelines are typically high-level demands for developers and testers, leaving a gap in translating them into actionable testing questions to verify LLM compliance. To address this challenge, we introduce GUARD (Guideline Upholding Test through Adaptive Role-play and Jailbreak Diagnostics), a testing method designed to operationalize guidelines into specific guideline-violating questions that assess LLM adherence. To implement this, GUARD uses automated generation of guideline-violating questions based on government-issued guidelines, thereby testing whether responses comply with these guidelines. When responses directly violate guidelines, GUARD reports inconsistencies. Furthermore, for responses that do not directly violate guidelines, GUARD integrates the concept of ``jailbreaks'' to diagnostics, named GUARD-JD, which creates scenarios that provoke unethical or guideline-violating responses, effectively identifying potential scenarios that could bypass built-in safety mechanisms. Our method finally culminates in a compliance report, delineating the extent of adherence and highlighting any violations. We empirically validated the effectiveness of GUARD on eight LLMs, including Vicuna-13B, LongChat-7B, Llama2-7B, Llama-3-8B, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and Claude-3.7, by testing compliance under three government-issued guidelines and conducting jailbreak diagnostics. Additionally, GUARD-JD can transfer jailbreak diagnostics to vision-language models (MiniGPT-v2 and Gemini-1.5), demonstrating its usage in promoting reliable LLM-based applications.

RelAItionship Building: Analyzing Recruitment Strategies for Participatory AI

Eugene Kim, Vaibhav Balloli, Berelian Karimian +2

Participatory AI, in which impacted community members and other stakeholders are involved in the design and development of AI systems, holds promise as a way to ensure AI is developed to meet their needs and reflect their values. However, the process of identifying, reaching out, and engaging with all relevant stakeholder groups, which we refer to as recruitment methodology, is still a practical challenge in AI projects striving to adopt participatory practices. In this paper, we investigate the challenges that researchers face when designing and executing recruitment methodology for Participatory AI projects, and the implications of current recruitment practice for Participatory AI. First, we describe the recruitment methodologies used in AI projects using a corpus of 37 projects to capture the diversity of practices in the field and perform an initial analysis on the documentation of recruitment practices, as well as specific strategies that researchers use to meet goals of equity and empowerment. To complement this analysis, we interview five AI researchers to learn about the outcomes of recruitment methodologies. We find that these outcomes are shaped by structural conditions of their work, researchers' own goals and expectations, and the relationships built from the recruitment methodology and subsequent collaboration. Based on these analyses, we provide recommendations for designing and executing relationship-forward recruitment methods, as well as reflexive recruitment documentation practices for Participatory AI researchers.

The growing adoption of home banking systems has increased cyberfraud risks, requiring detection models that are accurate, fair, and explainable. While AI methods show promise, they face challenges including computational inefficiency, limited interpretability of spiking neural networks (SNNs), and instability in reinforcement learning (RL)-based hyperparameter optimization. We propose a framework combining a Cortical Spiking Network with Population Coding (CSNPC) and a Reinforcement-Guided Hyper-Heuristic Optimizer (RHOSS). CSNPC leverages population coding for robust classification, while RHOSS applies Q-learning to adaptively select low-level heuristics under fairness and recall constraints. Integrated within the MoSSTI framework, the system incorporates explainable AI via saliency maps and spike activity profiling. Evaluated on the Bank Account Fraud (BAF) dataset, the model achieves 90.8% recall at 5% false positive rate, outperforming prior spiking and classical models while maintaining over 98% predictive equality across demographic groups. Although RHOSS introduces offline optimization cost, it is amortized at deployment. The sparse architecture of CSNPC further reduces energy consumption compared to dense ANNs. Results demonstrate that combining population-coded SNNs with RL-guided hyper-heuristics enables fair, interpretable, and high-performance fraud detection.

The rapid proliferation of Generative AI (GenAI) into diverse, high-stakes domains necessitates robust and reproducible evaluation methods. However, practitioners often resort to ad-hoc, non-standardized scripts, as common metrics are often unsuitable for specialized, structured outputs (e.g., automated plans, time-series) or holistic comparison across modalities (e.g., text, audio, and image). This fragmentation hinders comparability and slows AI system development. To address this challenge, we present GAICo (Generative AI Comparator): a deployed, open-source Python library that streamlines and standardizes GenAI output comparison. GAICo provides a unified, extensible framework supporting a comprehensive suite of reference-based metrics for unstructured text, specialized structured data formats, and multimedia (images, audio). Its architecture features a high-level API for rapid, end-to-end analysis, from multi-model comparison to visualization and reporting, alongside direct metric access for granular control. We demonstrate GAICo's utility through a detailed case study evaluating and debugging complex, multi-modal AI Travel Assistant pipelines. GAICo empowers AI researchers and developers to efficiently assess system performance, make evaluation reproducible, improve development velocity, and ultimately build more trustworthy AI systems, aligning with the goal of moving faster and safer in AI deployment. Since its release on PyPI in Jun 2025, the tool has been downloaded over 16K times, across versions, by Dec 2025, demonstrating growing community interest.

As AI systems are increasingly deployed to support decision-making in critical domains, explainability has become a means to enhance the understandability of these outputs and enable users to make more informed and conscious choices. However, despite growing interest in the usability of eXplainable AI (XAI), the accessibility of these methods, particularly for users with vision impairments, remains underexplored. This paper investigates accessibility gaps in XAI through a two-pronged approach. First, a literature review of 79 studies reveals that evaluations of XAI techniques rarely include disabled users, with most explanations relying on inherently visual formats. Second, we present a four-part methodological proof of concept that operationalizes inclusive XAI design: (1) categorization of AI systems, (2) persona definition and contextualization, (3) prototype design and implementation, and (4) expert and user assessment of XAI techniques for accessibility. Preliminary findings suggest that simplified explanations are more comprehensible for non-visual users than detailed ones, and that multimodal presentation is required for more equitable interpretability.

The field of Explainable AI (XAI) offers a wide range of techniques for making complex models interpretable. Yet, in practice, generating meaningful explanations is a context-dependent task that requires intentional design choices to ensure accessibility and transparency. This paper reframes explanation as a situated design process -- an approach particularly relevant for practitioners involved in building and deploying explainable systems. Drawing on prior research and principles from design thinking, we propose a three-part framework for explanation design in XAI: asking Who needs the explanation, What they need explained, and How that explanation should be delivered. We also emphasize the need for ethical considerations, including risks of epistemic inequality, reinforcing social inequities, and obscuring accountability and governance. By treating explanation as a sociotechnical design process, this framework encourages a context-aware approach to XAI that supports effective communication and the development of ethically responsible explanations.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in sensitive contexts where fairness and inclusivity are critical. Pronoun usage, especially concerning gender-neutral and neopronouns, remains a key challenge for responsible AI. Prior work, such as the MISGENDERED benchmark, revealed significant limitations in earlier LLMs' handling of inclusive pronouns, but was constrained to outdated models and limited evaluations. In this study, we introduce MISGENDERED+, an extended and updated benchmark for evaluating LLMs' pronoun fidelity. We benchmark five representative LLMs, GPT-4o, Claude 4, DeepSeek-V3, Qwen Turbo, and Qwen2.5, across zero-shot, few-shot, and gender identity inference. Our results show notable improvements compared with previous studies, especially in binary and gender-neutral pronoun accuracy. However, accuracy on neopronouns and reverse inference tasks remains inconsistent, underscoring persistent gaps in identity-sensitive reasoning. We discuss implications, model-specific observations, and avenues for future inclusive AI research.

Effective AI governance requires structured approaches for stakeholders to access and verify AI system behavior. With the rise of large language models, Natural Language Explanations (NLEs) are now key to articulating model behavior, which necessitates a focused examination of their characteristics and governance implications. We draw on Explainable AI (XAI) literature to create an updated XAI taxonomy, adapted to prompt-based NLEs, across three dimensions: (1) Context, including task, data, audience, and goals; (2) Generation and Presentation, covering generation methods, inputs, interactivity, outputs, and forms; and (3) Evaluation, focusing on content, presentation, and user-centered properties, as well as the setting of the evaluation. This taxonomy provides a framework for researchers, auditors, and policymakers to characterize, design, and enhance NLEs for transparent AI systems.

Causality has gained increasing attention in recent years, notably for improving the interpretability of machine learning models. Yet the field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been criticized for emphasizing general tendencies rather than the situation-specific facts, which users typically expect as explanations. These expectations align with the notion of actual causes, which identify what made the observed outcome happen, in the specific context at hand. Halpern and Pearl provided a formal basis for actual causation, but identifying actual causes is NP-complete. Practical identification algorithms are extremely scarce, restricted to narrow classes of models, and typically identify only the shortest cause. We address this gap between the formal theory and its applicability through two main contributions. First, we introduce a baseline approximate polynomial-time algorithm with adjustable precision, together with two complementary algorithms that improve its efficiency. Second, we provide a theoretical result showing that the actual-cause identification problem can be decomposed into smaller sub-instances that preserve the set of solutions. This result directly motivates one of the complementary algorithms. Our experiments demonstrate that the baseline method can approximate the set of actual causes, notably for non-Boolean and stochastic models, and that the complementary algorithms further improve its performance in most cases.

Electroencephalography (EEG)-based auditory attention detection (AAD) offers a non-invasive way to enhance hearing aids, but conventional methods rely on too many electrodes, limiting wearability and comfort. This paper presents SHAP-AAD, a two-stage framework that combines DeepSHAP-based channel selection with a lightweight temporal convolutional network (TCN) for efficient AAD using fewer channels.DeepSHAP, an explainable AI technique, is applied to a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on topographic alpha-power maps to rank channel importance, and the top-k EEG channels are used to train a compact TCN. Experiments on the DTU dataset show that using 32 channels yields comparable accuracy to the full 64-channel setup (79.21% vs. 81.06%) on average. In some cases, even 8 channels can deliver satisfactory accuracy. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of SHAP-AAD in reducing complexity while preserving high detection performance.

The rapid and disruptive integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education is reshaping fundamental academic practices. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of GenAI across three core academic domains: research, teaching, and scientific dissemination. Through a systematic review of recent literature indexed in the Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEEXplore databases, the main applications, benefits, and the profound ethical and governance challenges that are emerging are identified. The analysis reveals that, although GenAI offers significant potential to boost productivity and innovation, its adoption is outpacing the development of mature institutional safeguards. The main challenges include threats to academic integrity, the risk of algorithmic bias, and the need for robust AI literacy. The study is complemented by a case study detailing the development and positioning of a prototype AI assistant for scientific writing, demonstrating a path toward the development of responsible AI tools that augment rather than replace human intellect. It concludes that the integration of GenAI is an irreversible trend. The future of academia will not be defined by resistance to this technology, but by the ability of institutions and individuals to engage with it critically, ethically, and creatively. The article calls for increased interdisciplinary research, the development of clear ethical guidelines, and a focus on critical AI pedagogy as essential skills for the 21st century.