Research Papers

Since mpox can spread from person to person, it is a zoonotic viral illness that poses a significant public health concern. It is difficult to make an early clinical diagnosis because of how closely its symptoms match those of measles and chickenpox. Medical imaging combined with deep learning (DL) techniques has shown promise in improving disease detection by analyzing affected skin areas. Our study explore the feasibility to train deep learning and vision transformer-based models from scratch with publicly available skin lesion image dataset. Our experimental results show dataset limitation as a major drawback to build better classifier models trained from scratch. We used transfer learning with the help of pre-trained models to get a better classifier. The MobileNet-v2 outperformed other state of the art pre-trained models with 93.15% accuracy and 93.09% weighted average F1 score. ViT B16 and ResNet-50 also achieved satisfactory performance compared to already available studies with accuracy 92.12% and 86.21% respectively. To further validate the performance of the models, we applied explainable AI techniques.

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly function as human-like assistants exhibiting human-like personality traits, understanding their behavioral characteristics becomes essential for responsible AI development. However, existing evaluation efforts, which often adapt human psychological assessments such as the Big Five Inventory (BFI), face two significant limitations. First, these approaches often lack reliability, as minor prompt variations can lead to inconsistent test results. Second, the theoretical foundations of these tools, rooted in human studies, are misaligned with the computational nature of LLMs, thereby limiting their validity in predicting real-world model behavior. To address these limitations, we introduce the Core Sentiment Inventory (CSI), a novel personality trait evaluation instrument designed from the ground up and specifically tailored to the unique characteristics of LLMs. CSI covers both English and Chinese, that implicitly evaluates models' personality traits, providing insightful psychological portraits of LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that: (1) CSI effectively captures nuanced behavioral patterns, revealing significant behavioral variations in LLMs across different languages and contexts; (2) Compared to current evaluation tools, CSI significantly improves reliability, yielding more consistent and robust results; and (3) The correlation between CSI scores and LLMs' real-world outputs exceeds 0.85, demonstrating its strong validity in predicting LLM behavior.

We introduce Riemannian Integrated Gradients (RIG); an extension of Integrated Gradients (IG) to Riemannian manifolds. We demonstrate that RIG restricts to IG when the Riemannian manifold is Euclidean space. We show that feature attribution can be phrased as an eigenvalue problem where attributions correspond to eigenvalues of a symmetric endomorphism.

Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) in smart home environments is crucial for several applications, especially in the healthcare domain. The majority of the existing approaches leverage deep learning models. While these approaches are effective, the rationale behind their outputs is opaque. Recently, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches emerged to provide intuitive explanations to the output of HAR models. To the best of our knowledge, these approaches leverage classic deep models like CNNs or RNNs. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) proved to be effective for sensor-based HAR. However, existing approaches are not designed with explainability in mind. In this work, we propose the first explainable Graph Neural Network explicitly designed for smart home HAR. Our results on two public datasets show that this approach provides better explanations than state-of-the-art methods while also slightly improving the recognition rate.

Evaluating AI safety requires statistically rigorous methods and risk metrics for understanding how the use of AI affects aggregated risk. However, much AI safety literature focuses upon risks arising from AI models in isolation, lacking consideration of how modular use of AI affects risk distribution of workflow components or overall risk metrics. There is also a lack of statistical grounding enabling sensitisation of risk models in the presence of absence of AI to estimate causal contributions of AI. This is in part due to the dearth of AI impact data upon which to fit distributions. In this work, we address these gaps in two ways. First, we demonstrate how scenario modelling (grounded in established statistical techniques such as Markov chains, copulas and Monte Carlo simulation) can be used to model AI risk holistically. Second, we show how lookalike distributions from phenomena analogous to AI can be used to estimate AI impacts in the absence of directly observable data. We demonstrate the utility of our methods for benchmarking cumulative AI risk via risk analysis of a logistic scenario simulations.

Explainable AI (XAI) is critical for ensuring transparency, accountability, and trust in machine learning systems as black-box models are increasingly deployed within high-stakes domains. Among XAI methods, Shapley values are widely used for their fairness and consistency axioms. However, prevalent Shapley value approximation methods commonly rely on abstract baselines or computationally intensive calculations, which can limit their interpretability and scalability. To address such challenges, we propose Pairwise Shapley Values, a novel framework that grounds feature attributions in explicit, human-relatable comparisons between pairs of data instances proximal in feature space. Our method introduces pairwise reference selection combined with single-value imputation to deliver intuitive, model-agnostic explanations while significantly reducing computational overhead. Here, we demonstrate that Pairwise Shapley Values enhance interpretability across diverse regression and classification scenarios--including real estate pricing, polymer property prediction, and drug discovery datasets. We conclude that the proposed methods enable more transparent AI systems and advance the real-world applicability of XAI.

Evaluating Language Models on Grooming Risk Estimation Using Fuzzy Theory

Geetanjali Bihani, Tatiana Ringenberg, Julia Rayz

Encoding implicit language presents a challenge for language models, especially in high-risk domains where maintaining high precision is important. Automated detection of online child grooming is one such critical domain, where predators manipulate victims using a combination of explicit and implicit language to convey harmful intentions. While recent studies have shown the potential of Transformer language models like SBERT for preemptive grooming detection, they primarily depend on surface-level features and approximate real victim grooming processes using vigilante and law enforcement conversations. The question of whether these features and approximations are reasonable has not been addressed thus far. In this paper, we address this gap and study whether SBERT can effectively discern varying degrees of grooming risk inherent in conversations, and evaluate its results across different participant groups. Our analysis reveals that while fine-tuning aids language models in learning to assign grooming scores, they show high variance in predictions, especially for contexts containing higher degrees of grooming risk. These errors appear in cases that 1) utilize indirect speech pathways to manipulate victims and 2) lack sexually explicit content. This finding underscores the necessity for robust modeling of indirect speech acts by language models, particularly those employed by predators.

GitHub Copilot is transforming software development by automating tasks and boosting productivity through AI driven code generation. In this paper, we conduct a literature survey to synthesize insights on Copilot's impact on productivity and security. We review academic journal databases, industry reports, and official documentation to highlight key findings and challenges. While Copilot accelerates coding and prototyping, concerns over security vulnerabilities and intellectual property risks persist. Drawing from the literature, we provide a perspective on best practices and future directions for responsible AI adoption in software engineering, offering actionable insights for developers and organizations to integrate Copilot effectively while maintaining high standards of quality and security.

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly used in ethically sensitive domains such as education, healthcare, and transportation, balancing accuracy and interpretability has become a central concern. Coarse ethics (CE) motivates coarse-grained evaluations under cognitive, institutional, and contextual constraints, but it still lacks a simple mathematical formalization of admissible coarse-graining and its informational consequences. This paper introduces coarse-grained partitions (CGPs) as a discrete framework for modeling coarse evaluation on a finite totally ordered score scale. A CGP represents coarse evaluation as a partition into grains with an index assignment, and induces a coarse-grained distribution by pushforward. To compare admissible coarse-grainings, we introduce categorical unification (CU), which constructs a canonical fine-scale reconstruction from the coarse representation under minimal assumptions. On this basis, we define a KL-based measure of information loss, $D_{\mathrm{KL\text{-}CU}}$, as the divergence between the original fine-grained distribution and its CU-based reconstruction. We prove that $D_{\mathrm{KL\text{-}CU}}=0$ if and only if the original distribution is already uniform within each grain. This shows that zero loss, in the sense of the proposed measure, is a highly exceptional limiting case rather than a realistic benchmark for ordinary evaluative practice. We also show that the framework leads naturally to an optimization problem for comparing alternative admissible CGPs. Applications to educational grading and explainable AI (XAI) illustrate how the framework clarifies trade-offs among informational fidelity, interpretability, and coarsening cost.

Existing network paradigms have achieved lower downtime as well as a higher Quality of Experience (QoE) through the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based network management tools. These AI management systems, allow for automatic responses to changes in network conditions, lowering operation costs for operators, and improving overall performance. While adopting AI-based management tools enhance the overall network performance, it also introduce challenges such as removing human supervision, privacy violations, algorithmic bias, and model inaccuracies. Furthermore, AI-based agents that fail to address these challenges should be culpable themselves rather than the network as a whole. To address this accountability gap, a framework consisting of a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) model and a Machine Learning (ML) model is proposed to identify and assign numerical values of responsibility to the AI-based management agents involved in any decision-making regarding the network conditions, which eventually affects the end-user. A simulation environment was created for the framework to be trained using simulated network operation parameters. The DRL model had a 96% accuracy during testing for identifying the AI-based management agents, while the ML model using gradient descent learned the network conditions at an 83% accuracy during testing.

The development of robust safety benchmarks for large language models requires open, reproducible datasets that can measure both appropriate refusal of harmful content and potential over-restriction of legitimate scientific discourse. We present an open-source dataset and testing framework for evaluating LLM safety mechanisms across mainly controlled substance queries, analyzing four major models' responses to systematically varied prompts. Our results reveal distinct safety profiles: Claude-3.5-sonnet demonstrated the most conservative approach with 73% refusals and 27% allowances, while Mistral attempted to answer 100% of queries. GPT-3.5-turbo showed moderate restriction with 10% refusals and 90% allowances, and Grok-2 registered 20% refusals and 80% allowances. Testing prompt variation strategies revealed decreasing response consistency, from 85% with single prompts to 65% with five variations. This publicly available benchmark enables systematic evaluation of the critical balance between necessary safety restrictions and potential over-censorship of legitimate scientific inquiry, while providing a foundation for measuring progress in AI safety implementation. Chain-of-thought analysis reveals potential vulnerabilities in safety mechanisms, highlighting the complexity of implementing robust safeguards without unduly restricting desirable and valid scientific discourse.

This white paper underscores the critical importance of responsibly deploying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in military contexts, emphasizing a commitment to ethical and legal standards. The evolving role of AI in the military goes beyond mere technical applications, necessitating a framework grounded in ethical principles. The discussion within the paper delves into ethical AI principles, particularly focusing on the Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) guidelines. Noteworthy considerations encompass transparency, justice, non-maleficence, and responsibility. Importantly, the paper extends its examination to military-specific ethical considerations, drawing insights from the Just War theory and principles established by prominent entities. In addition to the identified principles, the paper introduces further ethical considerations specifically tailored for military AI applications. These include traceability, proportionality, governability, responsibility, and reliability. The application of these ethical principles is discussed on the basis of three use cases in the domains of sea, air, and land. Methods of automated sensor data analysis, eXplainable AI (XAI), and intuitive user experience are utilized to specify the use cases close to real-world scenarios. This comprehensive approach to ethical considerations in military AI reflects a commitment to aligning technological advancements with established ethical frameworks. It recognizes the need for a balance between leveraging AI's potential benefits in military operations while upholding moral and legal standards. The inclusion of these ethical principles serves as a foundation for responsible and accountable use of AI in the complex and dynamic landscape of military scenarios.