Research Papers

Insects are a crucial part of our ecosystem. Sadly, in the past few decades, their numbers have worryingly decreased. In an attempt to gain a better understanding of this process and monitor the insects populations, Deep Learning may offer viable solutions. However, given the breadth of their taxonomy and the typical hurdles of fine grained analysis, such as high intraclass variability compared to low interclass variability, insect classification remains a challenging task. There are few benchmark datasets, which impedes rapid development of better AI models. The annotation of rare species training data, however, requires expert knowledge. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) could assist biologists in these annotation tasks, but choosing the optimal XAI method is difficult. Our contribution to these research challenges is threefold: 1) a dataset of thoroughly annotated images of wild bees sampled from the iNaturalist database, 2) a ResNet model trained on the wild bee dataset achieving classification scores comparable to similar state-of-the-art models trained on other fine-grained datasets and 3) an investigation of XAI methods to support biologists in annotation tasks.

The Structure of Interdisciplinary Science: Uncovering and Explaining Roles in Citation Graphs

Eoghan Cunningham, Derek Greene

Role discovery is the task of dividing the set of nodes on a graph into classes of structurally similar roles. Modern strategies for role discovery typically rely on graph embedding techniques, which are capable of recognising complex local structures. However, when working with large, real-world networks, it is difficult to interpret or validate a set of roles identified according to these methods. In this work, motivated by advancements in the field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), we propose a new framework for interpreting role assignments on large graphs using small subgraph structures known as graphlets. We demonstrate our methods on a large, multidisciplinary citation network, where we successfully identify a number of important citation patterns which reflect interdisciplinary research

Rejected job applicants seldom receive explanations from employers. Techniques from Explainable AI (XAI) could provide explanations at scale. Although XAI researchers have developed many different types of explanations, we know little about the type of explanations job applicants want. We use a survey of recent job applicants to fill this gap. Our survey generates three main insights. First, the current norm of, at most, generic feedback frustrates applicants. Second, applicants feel the employer has an obligation to provide an explanation. Third, job applicants want to know why they were unsuccessful and how to improve.

Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) has been integrated into process mining tools as a value-adding task. PPM provides useful predictions on the further execution of the running business processes. To this end, machine learning-based techniques are widely employed in the context of PPM. In order to gain stakeholders trust and advocacy of PPM predictions, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods are employed in order to compensate for the lack of transparency of most efficient predictive models. Even when employed under the same settings regarding data, preprocessing techniques, and ML models, explanations generated by multiple XAI methods differ profoundly. A comparison is missing to distinguish XAI characteristics or underlying conditions that are deterministic to an explanation. To address this gap, we provide a framework to enable studying the effect of different PPM-related settings and ML model-related choices on characteristics and expressiveness of resulting explanations. In addition, we compare how different explainability methods characteristics can shape resulting explanations and enable reflecting underlying model reasoning process

Statistical production systems cover multiple steps from the collection, aggregation, and integration of data to tasks like data quality assurance and dissemination. While the context of data quality assurance is one of the most promising fields for applying machine learning, the lack of curated and labeled training data is often a limiting factor. The statistical production system for the Centralised Securities Database features an interactive feedback loop between data collected by the European Central Bank and data quality assurance performed by data quality managers at National Central Banks. The quality assurance feedback loop is based on a set of rule-based checks for raising exceptions, upon which the user either confirms the data or corrects an actual error. In this paper we use the information received from this feedback loop to optimize the exceptions presented to the National Central Banks thereby improving the quality of exceptions generated and the time consumed on the system by the users authenticating those exceptions. For this approach we make use of explainable supervised machine learning to (a) identify the types of exceptions and (b) to prioritize which exceptions are more likely to require an intervention or correction by the NCBs. Furthermore, we provide an explainable AI taxonomy aiming to identify the different explainable AI needs that arose during the project.

Neural network architectures have been extensively employed in the fair representation learning setting, where the objective is to learn a new representation for a given vector which is independent of sensitive information. Various "representation debiasing" techniques have been proposed in the literature. However, as neural networks are inherently opaque, these methods are hard to comprehend, which limits their usefulness. We propose a new framework for fair representation learning which is centered around the learning of "correction vectors", which have the same dimensionality as the given data vectors. The corrections are then simply summed up to the original features, and can therefore be analyzed as an explicit penalty or bonus to each feature. We show experimentally that a fair representation learning problem constrained in such a way does not impact performance.

In this paper we introduce a new problem within the growing literature of interpretability for convolution neural networks (CNNs). While previous work has focused on the question of how to visually interpret CNNs, we ask what it is that we care to interpret, that is, which layers and neurons are worth our attention? Due to the vast size of modern deep learning network architectures, automated, quantitative methods are needed to rank the relative importance of neurons so as to provide an answer to this question. We present a new statistical method for ranking the hidden neurons in any convolutional layer of a network. We define importance as the maximal correlation between the activation maps and the class score. We provide different ways in which this method can be used for visualization purposes with MNIST and ImageNet, and show a real-world application of our method to air pollution prediction with street-level images.

We recently developed a deep learning method that can determine the critical peak stress of a material by looking at scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the material's crystals. However, it has been somewhat unclear what kind of image features the network is keying off of when it makes its prediction. It is common in computer vision to employ an explainable AI saliency map to tell one what parts of an image are important to the network's decision. One can usually deduce the important features by looking at these salient locations. However, SEM images of crystals are more abstract to the human observer than natural image photographs. As a result, it is not easy to tell what features are important at the locations which are most salient. To solve this, we developed a method that helps us map features from important locations in SEM images to non-abstract textures that are easier to interpret.

Since the onset of the the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries across the world have implemented various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to contain the spread of virus, as well as economic support policies (ESPs) to save their economies. The pandemic and the associated NPIs have triggered unprecedented waves of economic shocks to the financial markets, including the foreign exchange (FX) markets. Although there are some studies exploring the impact of the NPIs and ESPs on FX markets, the relative impact of individual NPIs or ESPs has not been studied in a combined framework. In this work, we investigate the relative impact of NPIs and ESPs with Explainable AI (XAI) techniques. Experiments over exchange rate data of G10 currencies during the period from January 1, 2020 to January 13, 2021 suggest strong impacts on exchange rate markets by all measures of the strict lockdown, such as stay at home requirements, workplace closing, international travel control, and restrictions on internal movement. Yet, the impact of individual NPI and ESP can vary across different currencies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that uses XAI techniques to study the relative impact of NPIs and ESPs on the FX market. The derived insights can guide governments and policymakers to make informed decisions when facing with the ongoing pandemic and a similar situation in the near future.

Natural language understanding for logical games

Adrian Groza, Cristian Nitu

We developed a system able to automatically solve logical puzzles in natural language. Our solution is composed by a parser and an inference module. The parser translates the text into first order logic (FOL), while the MACE4 model finder is used to compute the models of the given FOL theory. We also empower our software agent with the capability to provide Yes/No answers to natural language questions related to each puzzle. Moreover, in line with Explainalbe Artificial Intelligence (XAI), the agent can back its answer, providing a graphical representation of the proof. The advantage of using reasoning for Natural Language Understanding (NLU) instead of Machine learning is that the user can obtain an explanation of the reasoning chain. We illustrate how the system performs on various types of natural language puzzles, including 382 knights and knaves puzzles. These features together with the overall performance rate of 80.89\% makes the proposed solution an improvement upon similar solvers for natural language understanding in the puzzles domain.

Previous research in interpretable machine learning (IML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) can be broadly categorized as either focusing on seeking interpretability in the agent's model (i.e., IML) or focusing on the context of the user in addition to the model (i.e., XAI). The former can be categorized as feature or instance attribution. Example- or sample-based methods such as those using or inspired by case-based reasoning (CBR) rely on various approaches to select instances that are not necessarily attributing instances responsible for an agent's decision. Furthermore, existing approaches have focused on interpretability and explainability but fall short when it comes to accountability. Inspired in case-based reasoning principles, this paper introduces a pseudo-metric we call Longitudinal distance and its use to attribute instances to a neural network agent's decision that can be potentially used to build accountable CBR agents.

We introduce the needs for explainable AI that arise from Standard No. 239 from the Basel Committee on Banking Standards (BCBS 239), which outlines 11 principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting for financial institutions. Of these, explainableAI is necessary for compliance in two key aspects: data quality, and appropriate reporting for multiple stakeholders. We describe the implementation challenges for one specific regulatory requirement:that of having a complete data taxonomy that is appropriate for firmwide use. The constantly evolving nature of financial ontologies necessitate a continuous updating process to ensure ongoing compliance.