Research Papers

Explanations are central to causal reasoning, and cognitive science has long established that the human drive to explain is itself a mechanism for learning about causality. Despite this, learning from those abductive signals is largely ignored in artificial intelligence. While explainable AI (XAI) increasingly draws on causal models to generate explanations, the converse direction about what explanations can do for causality remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, we propose xWhyL, a formal framework connecting causality and XAI by learning causal models from explanations. We develop a mathematical theory that translates explanations into a learning signal complementary to observational data, and demonstrate how it enables overcoming the limits of observational causal discovery. As explanations can be derived from incorrect beliefs and clash with data, a tension we call the Causal Tug-of-War, we prove conditions under which our framework rejects misspecified explanations rather than absorbing them. Our practical instantiation, Causal Interactive Learning (CIL), shows how expert explanations can efficiently support causal discovery and distinguish correct from incorrect explanations.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients require early, accurate detection to enable timely treatment and effective patient management. A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is well-suited for creating an end-to-end enabling environment for ALL detection and classification. However, most CNN-based ALL detection systems are theoretical and unsuitable for deployment on edge devices due to high computational demands. The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)-enabled devices offer an opportunity to monitor ALL patients in real time. Wearables that track temperature, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and activity can deliver critical data to support timely clinical intervention and improve patient outcomes. In smart IoMT environments, a lightweight CNN is essential because connected devices often operate under limited computational power, memory, and latency constraints. To address this need, this study proposes LukeNet, a lightweight CNN integrated with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for an IoMT-based SMART Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Detection and Management System. Trained on three (3) ALL datasets and five-fold cross-validation, LukeNet achieved an impressive 99% model accuracy as well as 99% unseen test accuracy, which is higher than six state-of-the-art (SOTA) CNNs, such as DenseNet121, MobileNet, ResNet50, InceptionV3, Xception, and VGG16, as well as transfer learning models. Furthermore, LukeNet was compared with two ensemble models. In addition, explainable AI methods are integrated to highlight relevant regions in microscopic images. The novelty of this study lies in the architecture of LukeNet, which balances model depth and computational efficiency by using depthwise separable convolutions, mitigates the risk of gradient loss in deeper layers, and provides strong global and local feature extraction capabilities.

Sixth-generation (6G) wireless systems are envisioned as networks of networks, integrating diverse in-X subnetworks that provide localized, high-performance connectivity. Ensuring reliable communication in dense deployments, such as industrial robots and vehicles, is challenging due to dynamic interference and strict performance requirements. Traditional radio resource management (RRM) methods have limitations, prompting the need for AI-based solutions. In this paper, we address the challenges of dynamic resource allocation and scheduling in 6G in-X subnetworks supporting applications with heterogeneous characteristics by proposing a novel framework that combines Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), Federated Learning (FL), and Explainable AI (XAI). Our solution is designed to improve the reliability, robustness, and transparency of resource management and intra-subnetwork scheduling while ensuring data privacy and fairness across multiple co-existing subnetworks. Unlike existing works, our approach considers a realistic scenario with multiple devices per subnetwork, thereby offering a more comprehensive and scalable solution. The proposed explainable RL framework enables agents to collaboratively optimize channel allocation and scheduling without the need to share raw data, preserving the privacy of each participating subnetwork. Extensive simulations based on 3GPP scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, showing significant improvements in performance, and transparency over existing solutions.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in production systems, raising concerns about their exposure to adversarial manipulation through prompt injection and jailbreak attacks. Classifier-based guardrails, such as Prompt Guard 2, are widely used as a first line of defense against such attacks, but their internal decision logic is largely opaque to both defenders and attackers. This paper presents an exploratory case study that applies explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to analyze how Prompt Guard 2 distinguishes malicious from benign prompts. We conduct four experiments to probe this question empirically. Guided by Vanilla Gradient and SHAP attributions, we find that Prompt Guard 2's decisions rely on the cumulative contribution of many tokens rather than a few dominant ones, yet saliency-guided synonym substitution and sentence-level paraphrasing can flip its predictions while altering only a moderate fraction of the text, in some cases yielding a successful jailbreak against the underlying LLM. A dataset-scale saliency analysis further shows that undetected injection prompts systematically lack the lexical markers the classifier relies on. We discuss the implications of these findings for the design and evaluation of classifier-based guardrails, and argue that explanation methods intended to support transparency can simultaneously lower the cost of constructing successful adversarial bypasses.

Children increasingly interact with AI chatbots, making trust calibration essential to AI literacy. Prior research has examined children's trust in AI mainly as users evaluating systems built by others, rather than as designers of their own chatbots. We developed a chatbot-building environment with adjustable trust-relevant traits (e.g., confidence, transparency, formality, assertiveness), rules, and persona. We conducted mixed-methods study with 115 learners (ages 8-18) who made 119 chatbots. We examined how children configured their chatbots, reasoned about trustworthiness, and how closely chatbot behavior aligned with their designs. Younger students (age 10-13) set significantly higher confidence than older students (age 14-18), and some deliberately built chatbots that gave wrong answers on purpose, yet still called them trustworthy, arguing that a chatbot does what it was built to do. Younger students equated trust with purpose-fulfillment, while older students linked it to transparent, calibrated design. Students also calibrated academic chatbots to be more transparent and formal than hobby chatbots. We identify seven design dimensions describing what children believe makes a chatbot trustworthy, and discuss implications for AI literacy tools.

From Decorative to Load-Bearing: Task Difficulty Shapes the Causal Role of Chain-of-Thought

Renee Jia, Di Mu

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is only meaningful if written reasoning causally constrains the answer. We introduce continuation-based causal testing, an ablation-patch intervention that perturbs one reasoning step, truncates the chain, and forces the model to continue from the corrupted prefix. It measures how load-bearing a CoT is for the final answer, a behavioral notion distinct from mechanistic faithfulness. Across Gemma-2-9B-IT, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B on GSM8K, MMLU, and BIG-Bench Hard, CoT load-bearingness tracks model-relative task difficulty: on easy tasks models silently bypass their own reasoning; on hard tasks they follow corrupted steps and propagate errors. A matched 2x2 analysis shows task difficulty dominates perturbation type: error propagation rises 16x from GSM8K to BBH multistep arithmetic, and a variance partition over 28,584 continuations attributes 98.8% of explained deviance to task difficulty versus 0.8% to perturbation type. Reasoning-specific RL suppresses error propagation and compresses the gradient. A four-variant judge-sensitivity analysis and blind two-annotator study (n=500) show the error-propagation vs. non-propagation label is invariant to judge prompt, with perfect inter-annotator agreement (Cohen's kappa = 1.00). This gradient creates a structural problem for CoT-based oversight and AI safety monitoring: where the trace is easy to read it carries little signal, and where it matters errors propagate before a monitor can intervene. Linear probes on hidden states separate silent bypass, self-correction, and error propagation, but additive activation steering provides limited causal control, flipping only about 25% of error-propagation cases at best. Behavioral mode is readable but not reliably controllable.

Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for soil analysis using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). However, traditional black-box models often lack interpretability, limiting their effectiveness in decision-making processes. This study introduced explainable AI (XAI) techniques to enhance both the interpretability and classification performance of Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) models for soil classification with LIBS. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) was employed to identify the local spectral features associated with soil elements, providing explanations for their contributions to classification outcomes. To improve classification performance on unlabeled spectra, prediction uncertainty was quantified by sequentially removing the top local spectral features identified by LIME as critical to the classification. Higher uncertainty was associated with a smaller number of feature removals needed to change the label. Spectra for which a large number of features had to be removed before the label changed were treated as high-confidence predictions and admitted to a co-training process. Thresholds on this flip count were defined separately for spectrally ambiguous and stable classes to manage uncertainty identification effectively. To address the sensitivity of PLS-DA to class imbalances, equal proportions of pseudo-labels from each class were included in co-training. The proposed method was evaluated on the publicly available EMSLIBS dataset, achieving a test accuracy of 92.69\%, competitive with the best-performing methods in the literature. The XAI results provided insights into the causes of misclassifications and identified the dominant spectral features critical for accurate predictions, advancing interpretable AI solutions for LIBS-based soil analysis.

Bangla, the seventh most spoken language in the world, exhibits significant regional dialectal diversity, with dialects such as Barishal, Chattogram, Sylhet, Noakhali, and Mymensingh differing in lexical, morphological, and syntactic characteristics. These variations pose substantial challenges for Named Entity Recognition (NER), limiting the generalization of models trained on Standard Bangla or a single regional dialect. This paper presents a cross-dialect Bangla NER framework using the publicly available ANCHOLIK-NER dataset, comprising 17,405 annotated sentences and 101,817 tokens across five major Bangla regional dialects. A Leave-One-Dialect-Out Cross-Validation (LODOCV) strategy is adopted, training models on four dialects and evaluating on the remaining unseen dialect. Eight pretrained transformer-based models, including BanglaBERT, MuRIL, XLM-RoBERTa, and Multilingual-E5, are evaluated under identical experimental settings. Multilingual-E5 Large achieves the highest F1-score in every fold, peaking at 97.26% on Mymensingh and reaching its lowest, 82.38%, on Chattogram, the most challenging target dialect. To improve interpretability, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) are applied to word-level predictions, revealing that the model's decisions are driven primarily by the surface form of the target entity word itself rather than by surrounding sentence context. These findings establish a benchmark for cross-dialect Bangla NER and demonstrate the effectiveness of transformer-based transfer learning for low-resource regional dialects, while highlighting the surface-form dependence of current models as a direction for future work.

Accurate automated interpretation of electrocardio- grams (ECGs) is essential for early detection of cardiac condi- tions such as myocardial infarction and rhythm abnormalities. However, many high-performing deep learning models remain difficult to deploy in clinical settings due to limited transparency and lack of reliability validation. In this work, we present X- Beat, an explainable and reliability-aware benchmark framework for ECG image classification designed to support trustworthy AI systems in healthcare. The proposed framework combines transfer learning with post-hoc explainability and systematic reliability evaluation across four cardiac classes: Abnormal Heartbeat, History of Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial In- farction, and Normal Heartbeat. Multiple ImageNet-pretrained CNN backbones, including EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-50, DenseNet- 121, and MobileNetV3-Large, are evaluated under a unified training protocol. Beyond standard performance metrics, we incorporate Grad-CAM-based visual explanations together with additional analyses, including explanation stability, regional sen- sitivity, and confidence-based reliability assessment, to examine whether model predictions are supported by clinically meaningful evidence. Experimental results show that ResNet-50 achieves the best performance, reaching 91.94% accuracy and a macro F1- score of 0.9098, with strong class separability (AUC up to 0.995). Explanation analyses indicate that the model primarily focuses on waveform-relevant regions, while reliability evaluation suggests that most incorrect predictions occur with lower confidence. Overall, this work provides a structured and reproducible bench- mark for evaluating both predictive performance and explanation reliability in ECG image classification, contributing toward the development of trustworthy and interpretable AI components for clinical decision support systems.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has become essential in medical image analysis to ensure transparency of deep learning (DL)-based diagnostic systems. However, selecting appropriate XAI techniques for breast cancer recognition remains largely ad hoc, with limited systematic evaluation across different DL architectures. This study presents a systematic architecture-aware evaluation protocol to assess the effectiveness of nine widely used XAI techniques across four categories of DL models: very deep, lightweight, transformer-based and hybrid neural networks. The evaluation is conducted on a breast ultrasound dataset comprising 780 images using clinically aligned spatial metrics, including Pointing Game, Intersection over Union and Mean Coverage, to quantify agreement between generated explanations and expert-annotated lesion regions. Results indicate that explanation quality is primarily influenced by the interaction between model architecture and XAI method, rather than any single technique consistently outperforming others. Hybrid architectures produce more spatially coherent explanations, while lightweight and transformer-based models exhibit greater variability across methods. The findings show that no single technique generalises across architectures and evaluation criteria, emphasising the need for joint selection of DL models and XAI techniques. Explainability depends on both model design and explanation strategy and should not be considered independently. This work provides a structured evaluation protocol and practical guidance for selecting XAI techniques in breast cancer diagnosis, supporting more transparent clinical decision-support systems. \textcolor{blue}{Code is publicly available at https://github.com/Nishan-Charlie/Explainable-AI}

Large language models are usually interpreted through concepts that humans already possess: truthfulness, refusal, deception, personality, harmfulness, and related categories. This paper asks whether models may also represent and use distinctions for which no adequate human concept exists. We call such internal structures xeno-representations, and their study xeno-interpretability. We distinguish the human-interpretable semantic space from the xeno-semantic space: the region of model-native representations for which no adequate human conceptual counterpart is available. We show that the space of possible internal distinctions in an LLM is substantially larger than the space available through finite human descriptions. We then separate experimental identification from semantic interpretation: an internal representation may be reproducibly located, geometrically characterized, causally manipulated, and linked to downstream behaviour even when its semantic content cannot be adequately expressed in human terms. On this basis, we sketch an empirical programme to identify xeno-representations. We finally examine the implications for AI safety and multi-agent systems, where model-native representations may propagate and stabilize across interacting agents while remaining only partially visible through human-readable communication. Xeno-interpretability therefore shifts the aim of interpretability from finding human concepts inside models toward discovering and characterizing the representational structures that are native to the models themselves and might affect their behaviour in unpredictable ways.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) solutions are essential for building trust in AI technologies and their integration in real manufacturing lines. However, most existing methods are tailored to technical experts, limiting their accessibility to diverse user groups such as blue-collar workers in manufacturing lines who use AI for quality control. In this work, we introduce an XAI interface for object detection in industrial manufacturing based on a fine-tuned vision-language model, designed to generate intuitive explanations for non-expert users. We benchmark existing vision-language models and demonstrate that out-of-the-box models often fall short in delivering clear, context-relevant explanations for non-expert users. To address this, we fine-tune a vision-language model and integrate it into our interface, enabling contextualized, accessible explanations for non-expert users. We demonstrate improvements in explanation clarity, instruction adherence, image groundedness, and contextual awareness over GPT 4o-mini on proprietary and public robotics dataset. This approach advances the accessibility and usability of AI explanations, making them more intuitive and applicable in manufacturing domain.