Research Papers

Despite neural networks (NN) have been widely applied in various fields and generally outperforms humans, they still lack interpretability to a certain extent, and humans are unable to intuitively understand the decision logic of NN. This also hinders the knowledge interaction between humans and NN, preventing humans from getting involved to give direct guidance when NN's decisions go wrong. While recent research in explainable AI has achieved interpretability of NN from various perspectives, it has not yet provided effective methods for knowledge exchange between humans and NN. To address this problem, we constructed a two-way interaction interface that uses structured representations of visual concepts and their relationships as the "language" for knowledge exchange between humans and NN. Specifically, NN provide intuitive reasoning explanations to humans based on the class-specific structural concepts graph (C-SCG). On the other hand, humans can modify the biases present in the C-SCG through their prior knowledge and reasoning ability, and thus provide direct knowledge guidance to NN through this interface. Through experimental validation, based on this interaction interface, NN can provide humans with easily understandable explanations of the reasoning process. Furthermore, human involvement and prior knowledge can directly and effectively contribute to enhancing the performance of NN.

With growing concerns regarding bias and discrimination in predictive models, the AI community has increasingly focused on assessing AI system trustworthiness. Conventionally, trustworthy AI literature relies on the probabilistic framework and calibration as prerequisites for trustworthiness. In this work, we depart from this viewpoint by proposing a novel trust framework inspired by the philosophy literature on trust. We present a precise mathematical definition of trustworthiness, termed $\mathcal{U}$-trustworthiness, specifically tailored for a subset of tasks aimed at maximizing a utility function. We argue that a model's $\mathcal{U}$-trustworthiness is contingent upon its ability to maximize Bayes utility within this task subset. Our first set of results challenges the probabilistic framework by demonstrating its potential to favor less trustworthy models and introduce the risk of misleading trustworthiness assessments. Within the context of $\mathcal{U}$-trustworthiness, we prove that properly-ranked models are inherently $\mathcal{U}$-trustworthy. Furthermore, we advocate for the adoption of the AUC metric as the preferred measure of trustworthiness. By offering both theoretical guarantees and experimental validation, AUC enables robust evaluation of trustworthiness, thereby enhancing model selection and hyperparameter tuning to yield more trustworthy outcomes.

We propose a new way to explain and to visualize neural network classification through a decomposition-based explainable AI (DXAI). Instead of providing an explanation heatmap, our method yields a decomposition of the image into class-agnostic and class-distinct parts, with respect to the data and chosen classifier. Following a fundamental signal processing paradigm of analysis and synthesis, the original image is the sum of the decomposed parts. We thus obtain a radically different way of explaining classification. The class-agnostic part ideally is composed of all image features which do not posses class information, where the class-distinct part is its complementary. This new visualization can be more helpful and informative in certain scenarios, especially when the attributes are dense, global and additive in nature, for instance, when colors or textures are essential for class distinction. Code is available at https://github.com/dxai2024/dxai.

As computational systems supported by artificial intelligence (AI) techniques continue to play an increasingly pivotal role in making high-stakes recommendations and decisions across various domains, the demand for explainable AI (XAI) has grown significantly, extending its impact into cognitive learning research. Providing explanations for novel concepts is recognised as a fundamental aid in the learning process, particularly when addressing challenges stemming from knowledge deficiencies and skill application. Addressing these difficulties involves timely explanations and guidance throughout the learning process, prompting the interest of AI experts in developing explainer models. In this paper, we introduce an intelligent system (CL-XAI) for Cognitive Learning which is supported by XAI, focusing on two key research objectives: exploring how human learners comprehend the internal mechanisms of AI models using XAI tools and evaluating the effectiveness of such tools through human feedback. The use of CL-XAI is illustrated with a game-inspired virtual use case where learners tackle combinatorial problems to enhance problem-solving skills and deepen their understanding of complex concepts, highlighting the potential for transformative advances in cognitive learning and co-learning.

Understanding when and why to apply any given eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) technique is not a straightforward task. There is no single approach that is best suited for a given context. This paper aims to address the challenge of selecting the most appropriate explainer given the context in which an explanation is required. For AI explainability to be effective, explanations and how they are presented needs to be oriented towards the stakeholder receiving the explanation. If -- in general -- no single explanation technique surpasses the rest, then reasoning over the available methods is required in order to select one that is context-appropriate. Due to the transparency they afford, we propose employing argumentation techniques to reach an agreement over the most suitable explainers from a given set of possible explainers. In this paper, we propose a modular reasoning system consisting of a given mental model of the relevant stakeholder, a reasoner component that solves the argumentation problem generated by a multi-explainer component, and an AI model that is to be explained suitably to the stakeholder of interest. By formalising supporting premises -- and inferences -- we can map stakeholder characteristics to those of explanation techniques. This allows us to reason over the techniques and prioritise the best one for the given context, while also offering transparency into the selection decision.

This paper proposes the use of causal modeling to detect and mitigate algorithmic bias that is nonlinear in the protected attribute. We provide a general overview of our approach. We use the German Credit data set, which is available for download from the UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository, to develop (1) a prediction model, which is treated as a black box, and (2) a causal model for bias mitigation. In this paper, we focus on age bias and the problem of binary classification. We show that the probability of getting correctly classified as "low risk" is lowest among young people. The probability increases with age nonlinearly. To incorporate the nonlinearity into the causal model, we introduce a higher order polynomial term. Based on the fitted causal model, the de-biased probability estimates are computed, showing improved fairness with little impact on overall classification accuracy. Causal modeling is intuitive and, hence, its use can enhance explicability and promotes trust among different stakeholders of AI.

Shapley values are extensively used in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) as a framework to explain predictions made by complex machine learning (ML) models. In this work, we focus on conditional Shapley values for predictive models fitted to tabular data and explain the prediction $f(\boldsymbol{x}^{*})$ for a single observation $\boldsymbol{x}^{*}$ at the time. Numerous Shapley value estimation methods have been proposed and empirically compared on an average basis in the XAI literature. However, less focus has been devoted to analyzing the precision of the Shapley value explanations on an individual basis. We extend our work in Olsen et al. (2023) by demonstrating and discussing that the explanations are systematically less precise for observations on the outer region of the training data distribution for all used estimation methods. This is expected from a statistical point of view, but to the best of our knowledge, it has not been systematically addressed in the Shapley value literature. This is crucial knowledge for Shapley values practitioners, who should be more careful in applying these observations' corresponding Shapley value explanations.

FlexModel: A Framework for Interpretability of Distributed Large Language Models

Matthew Choi, Muhammad Adil Asif, John Willes +1

With the growth of large language models, now incorporating billions of parameters, the hardware prerequisites for their training and deployment have seen a corresponding increase. Although existing tools facilitate model parallelization and distributed training, deeper model interactions, crucial for interpretability and responsible AI techniques, still demand thorough knowledge of distributed computing. This often hinders contributions from researchers with machine learning expertise but limited distributed computing background. Addressing this challenge, we present FlexModel, a software package providing a streamlined interface for engaging with models distributed across multi-GPU and multi-node configurations. The library is compatible with existing model distribution libraries and encapsulates PyTorch models. It exposes user-registerable HookFunctions to facilitate straightforward interaction with distributed model internals, bridging the gap between distributed and single-device model paradigms. Primarily, FlexModel enhances accessibility by democratizing model interactions and promotes more inclusive research in the domain of large-scale neural networks. The package is found at https://github.com/VectorInstitute/flex_model.

Evaluating Trustworthiness of AI-Enabled Decision Support Systems: Validation of the Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST)

Pouria Salehi, Yang Ba, Nayoung Kim +10

The Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST) is a checklist tool based on analytic tradecraft standards to inform the design and evaluation of trustworthy AI systems. In this study, we evaluate whether MAST is associated with people's trust perceptions in AI-enabled decision support systems (AI-DSSs). Evaluating trust in AI-DSSs poses challenges to researchers and practitioners. These challenges include identifying the components, capabilities, and potential of these systems, many of which are based on the complex deep learning algorithms that drive DSS performance and preclude complete manual inspection. We developed two interactive, AI-DSS test environments using the MAST criteria. One emulated an identity verification task in security screening, and another emulated a text summarization system to aid in an investigative reporting task. Each test environment had one version designed to match low-MAST ratings, and another designed to match high-MAST ratings, with the hypothesis that MAST ratings would be positively related to the trust ratings of these systems. A total of 177 subject matter experts were recruited to interact with and evaluate these systems. Results generally show higher MAST ratings for the high-MAST conditions compared to the low-MAST groups, and that measures of trust perception are highly correlated with the MAST ratings. We conclude that MAST can be a useful tool for designing and evaluating systems that will engender high trust perceptions, including AI-DSS that may be used to support visual screening and text summarization tasks. However, higher MAST ratings may not translate to higher joint performance.

Steering Responsible AI: A Case for Algorithmic Pluralism

Stefaan G. Verhulst

In this paper, I examine questions surrounding AI neutrality through the prism of existing literature and scholarship about mediation and media pluralism. Such traditions, I argue, provide a valuable theoretical framework for how we should approach the (likely) impending era of AI mediation. In particular, I suggest examining further the notion of algorithmic pluralism. Contrasting this notion to the dominant idea of algorithmic transparency, I seek to describe what algorithmic pluralism may be, and present both its opportunities and challenges. Implemented thoughtfully and responsibly, I argue, Algorithmic or AI pluralism has the potential to sustain the diversity, multiplicity, and inclusiveness that are so vital to democracy.

Can governments build AI? In this paper, we describe an ongoing effort to develop ``public AI'' -- publicly accessible AI models funded, provisioned, and governed by governments or other public bodies. Public AI presents both an alternative and a complement to standard regulatory approaches to AI, but it also suggests new technical and policy challenges. We present a roadmap for how the ML research community can help shape this initiative and support its implementation, and how public AI can complement other responsible AI initiatives.

This paper presents the real-world smart-meter dataset and offers an analysis of solutions derived from the Energy Prediction Technical Challenges, focusing primarily on two key competitions: the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society (IEEE-CIS) Technical Challenge on Energy Prediction from Smart Meter data in 2020 (named EP) and its follow-up challenge at the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) in 2021 (named as XEP). These competitions focus on accurate energy consumption forecasting and the importance of interpretability in understanding the underlying factors. The challenge aims to predict monthly and yearly estimated consumption for households, addressing the accurate billing problem with limited historical smart meter data. The dataset comprises 3,248 smart meters, with varying data availability ranging from a minimum of one month to a year. This paper delves into the challenges, solutions and analysing issues related to the provided real-world smart meter data, developing accurate predictions at the household level, and introducing evaluation criteria for assessing interpretability. Additionally, this paper discusses aspects beyond the competitions: opportunities for energy disaggregation and pattern detection applications at the household level, significance of communicating energy-driven factors for optimised billing, and emphasising the importance of responsible AI and data privacy considerations. These aspects provide insights into the broader implications and potential advancements in energy consumption prediction. Overall, these competitions provide a dataset for residential energy research and serve as a catalyst for exploring accurate forecasting, enhancing interpretability, and driving progress towards the discussion of various aspects such as energy disaggregation, demand response programs or behavioural interventions.