Research Papers

We created a fine-grained AI system for the detection of antisemitism. This Explainable AI will identify English and German anti-Semitic expressions of dehumanization, verbal aggression and conspiracies in online social media messages across platforms, to support high-level decision making.

The field of computer vision is rapidly evolving, particularly in the context of new methods of neural architecture design. These models contribute to (1) the Climate Crisis - increased CO2 emissions and (2) the Privacy Crisis - data leakage concerns. To address the often overlooked impact the Computer Vision (CV) community has on these crises, we outline a novel ethical framework, \textit{P4AI}: Principlism for AI, an augmented principlistic view of ethical dilemmas within AI. We then suggest using P4AI to make concrete recommendations to the community to mitigate the climate and privacy crises.

Automatically understanding and recognising human affective states using images and computer vision can improve human-computer and human-robot interaction. However, privacy has become an issue of great concern, as the identities of people used to train affective models can be exposed in the process. For instance, malicious individuals could exploit images from users and assume their identities. In addition, affect recognition using images can lead to discriminatory and algorithmic bias, as certain information such as race, gender, and age could be assumed based on facial features. Possible solutions to protect the privacy of users and avoid misuse of their identities are to: (1) extract anonymised facial features, namely action units (AU) from a database of images, discard the images and use AUs for processing and training, and (2) federated learning (FL) i.e. process raw images in users' local machines (local processing) and send the locally trained models to the main processing machine for aggregation (central processing). In this paper, we propose a two-level deep learning architecture for affect recognition that uses AUs in level 1 and FL in level 2 to protect users' identities. The architecture consists of recurrent neural networks to capture the temporal relationships amongst the features and predict valence and arousal affective states. In our experiments, we evaluate the performance of our privacy-preserving architecture using different variations of recurrent neural networks on RECOLA, a comprehensive multimodal affective database. Our results show state-of-the-art performance of $0.426$ for valence and $0.401$ for arousal using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient evaluation metric, demonstrating the feasibility of developing models for affect recognition that are both accurate and ensure privacy.

An ambient sensor network is installed in Smart Homes to identify low-level events taking place by residents, which are then analysed to generate a profile of activities of daily living. These profiles are compared to both the resident's typical profile and to known "risky" profiles to support recommendation of evidence-based interventions. Maintaining trust presents an XAI challenge because the recommendations are not easily interpretable. Trust in the system can be improved by making the decision-making process more transparent. We propose a visualisation workflow which presents the data in clear, colour-coded graphs.

Self-tracking can improve people's awareness of their unhealthy behaviors and support reflection to inform behavior change. Increasingly, new technologies make tracking easier, leading to large amounts of tracked data. However, much of that information is not salient for reflection and self-awareness. To tackle this burden for reflection, we created the SalienTrack framework, which aims to 1) identify salient tracking events, 2) select the salient details of those events, 3) explain why they are informative, and 4) present the details as manually elicited or automatically shown feedback. We implemented SalienTrack in the context of nutrition tracking. To do this, we first conducted a field study to collect photo-based mobile food tracking over 1-5 weeks. We then report how we used this data to train an explainable-AI model of salience. Finally, we created interfaces to present salient information and conducted a formative user study to gain insights about how SalienTrack could be integrated into an interface for reflection. Our key contributions are the SalienTrack framework, a demonstration of its implementation for semi-automated feedback in an important and challenging self-tracking context and a discussion of the broader uses of the framework.

In this paper, genetic programming reinforcement learning (GPRL) is utilized to generate human-interpretable control policies for a Chylla-Haase polymerization reactor. Such continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) with jacket cooling are widely used in the chemical industry, in the production of fine chemicals, pigments, polymers, and medical products. Despite appearing rather simple, controlling CSTRs in real-world applications is quite a challenging problem to tackle. GPRL utilizes already existing data from the reactor and generates fully automatically a set of optimized simplistic control strategies, so-called policies, the domain expert can choose from. Note that these policies are white-box models of low complexity, which makes them easy to validate and implement in the target control system, e.g., SIMATIC PCS 7. However, despite its low complexity the automatically-generated policy yields a high performance in terms of reactor temperature control deviation, which we empirically evaluate on the original reactor template.

Defeasible rules are used in providing computable representations of legal documents and, more recently, have been suggested as a basis for explainable AI. Such applications draw attention to the scalability of implementations. The defeasible logic $DL(\partial_{||})$ was introduced as a more scalable alternative to $DL(\partial)$, which is better known. In this paper we consider the use of (implementations of) $DL(\partial_{||})$ as a computational aid to computing conclusions in $DL(\partial)$ and other defeasible logics, rather than as an alternative to $DL(\partial)$. We identify conditions under which $DL(\partial_{||})$ can be substituted for $DL(\partial)$ with no change to the conclusions drawn, and conditions under which $DL(\partial_{||})$ can be used to draw some valid conclusions, leaving the remainder to be drawn by $DL(\partial)$.

The growing number of AI applications, also for high-stake decisions, increases the interest in Explainable and Interpretable Machine Learning (XI-ML). This trend can be seen both in the increasing number of regulations and strategies for developing trustworthy AI and the growing number of scientific papers dedicated to this topic. To ensure the sustainable development of AI, it is essential to understand the dynamics of the impact of regulation on research papers as well as the impact of scientific discourse on AI-related policies. This paper introduces a novel framework for joint analysis of AI-related policy documents and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research papers. The collected documents are enriched with metadata and interconnections, using various NLP methods combined with a methodology inspired by Institutional Grammar. Based on the information extracted from collected documents, we showcase a series of analyses that help understand interactions, similarities, and differences between documents at different stages of institutionalization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to use automatic language analysis tools to understand the dynamics between XI-ML methods and regulations. We believe that such a system contributes to better cooperation between XAI researchers and AI policymakers.

In this position paper, I provide a socio-technical perspective on machine learning-based systems. I also explain why systematic audits may be preferable to explainable AI systems. I make concrete recommendations for how institutions governed by public law akin to the German TÜV and Stiftung Warentest can ensure that ML systems operate in the interest of the public.

On the (Un-)Avoidability of Adversarial Examples

Sadia Chowdhury, Ruth Urner

The phenomenon of adversarial examples in deep learning models has caused substantial concern over their reliability. While many deep neural networks have shown impressive performance in terms of predictive accuracy, it has been shown that in many instances an imperceptible perturbation can falsely flip the network's prediction. Most research has then focused on developing defenses against adversarial attacks or learning under a worst-case adversarial loss. In this work, we take a step back and aim to provide a framework for determining whether a model's label change under small perturbation is justified (and when it is not). We carefully argue that adversarial robustness should be defined as a locally adaptive measure complying with the underlying distribution. We then suggest a definition for an adaptive robust loss, derive an empirical version of it, and develop a resulting data-augmentation framework. We prove that our adaptive data-augmentation maintains consistency of 1-nearest neighbor classification under deterministic labels and provide illustrative empirical evaluations.

Information Theoretic Evaluation of Privacy-Leakage, Interpretability, and Transferability for Trustworthy AI

Mohit Kumar, Bernhard A. Moser, Lukas Fischer +1

In order to develop machine learning and deep learning models that take into account the guidelines and principles of trustworthy AI, a novel information theoretic trustworthy AI framework is introduced. A unified approach to "privacy-preserving interpretable and transferable learning" is considered for studying and optimizing the tradeoffs between privacy, interpretability, and transferability aspects. A variational membership-mapping Bayesian model is used for the analytical approximations of the defined information theoretic measures for privacy-leakage, interpretability, and transferability. The approach consists of approximating the information theoretic measures via maximizing a lower-bound using variational optimization. The study presents a unified information theoretic approach to study different aspects of trustworthy AI in a rigorous analytical manner. The approach is demonstrated through numerous experiments on benchmark datasets and a real-world biomedical application concerned with the detection of mental stress on individuals using heart rate variability analysis.

Do not explain without context: addressing the blind spot of model explanations

Katarzyna Woźnica, Katarzyna Pękala, Hubert Baniecki +3

The increasing number of regulations and expectations of predictive machine learning models, such as so called right to explanation, has led to a large number of methods promising greater interpretability. High demand has led to a widespread adoption of XAI techniques like Shapley values, Partial Dependence profiles or permutational variable importance. However, we still do not know enough about their properties and how they manifest in the context in which explanations are created by analysts, reviewed by auditors, and interpreted by various stakeholders. This paper highlights a blind spot which, although critical, is often overlooked when monitoring and auditing machine learning models: the effect of the reference data on the explanation calculation. We discuss that many model explanations depend directly or indirectly on the choice of the referenced data distribution. We showcase examples where small changes in the distribution lead to drastic changes in the explanations, such as a change in trend or, alarmingly, a conclusion. Consequently, we postulate that obtaining robust and useful explanations always requires supporting them with a broader context.