Responsible AI research from arXiv, ranked by citations from
Semantic Scholar (
Allen AI ), and enriched with key takeaways
6,810 papers
Samuele Punzo, Silvia Giulia Galfrè, Francesco Massafra +3
We present a machine learning pipeline for biomarker discovery in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), integrating eight publicly available microarray datasets from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC). After robust preprocessing we trained an XGBoost classifier optimized via Bayesian search. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to identify key features for model prediction, indicating thus possible biomarkers. These were compared with genes identified through classical Differential Expression Analysis (DEA). Our comparison revealed both overlapping and unique biomarkers between SHAP and DEA, suggesting complementary strengths. Enrichment analysis confirmed the biological relevance of SHAP-selected genes, linking them to pathways such as sphingolipid signaling, Th1/Th2/Th17 cell differentiation, and Epstein-Barr virus infection all known to be associated with MS. This study highlights the value of combining explainable AI (xAI) with traditional statistical methods to gain deeper insights into disease mechanism.
Adrian Kuenzler, Stefan Schmid
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly central to many applications, raising concerns about bias, fairness, and regulatory compliance. This paper reviews risks of biased outputs and their societal impact, focusing on frameworks like the EU's AI Act and the Digital Services Act. We argue that beyond constant regulation, stronger attention to competition and design governance is needed to ensure fair, trustworthy AI. This is a preprint of the Communications of the ACM article of the same title.
KT, :, Yunjin Park +17
KT developed a Responsible AI (RAI) assessment methodology and risk mitigation technologies to ensure the safety and reliability of AI services. By analyzing the Basic Act on AI implementation and global AI governance trends, we established a unique approach for regulatory compliance and systematically identify and manage all potential risk factors from AI development to operation. We present a reliable assessment methodology that systematically verifies model safety and robustness based on KT's AI risk taxonomy tailored to the domestic environment. We also provide practical tools for managing and mitigating identified AI risks. With the release of this report, we also release proprietary Guardrail : SafetyGuard that blocks harmful responses from AI models in real-time, supporting the enhancement of safety in the domestic AI development ecosystem. We also believe these research outcomes provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to develop Responsible AI.
Nguyen Van Tu, Pham Nguyen Hai Long, Vo Hoai Viet
Deep learning has become the de facto standard and dominant paradigm in image analysis tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance. However, this approach often results in "black-box" models, whose decision-making processes are difficult to interpret, raising concerns about reliability in critical applications. To address this challenge and provide human a method to understand how AI model process and make decision, the field of xAI has emerged. This paper surveys four representative approaches in xAI for visual perception tasks: (i) Saliency Maps, (ii) Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM), (iii) Prototype-based methods, and (iv) Hybrid approaches. We analyze their underlying mechanisms, strengths and limitations, as well as evaluation metrics, thereby providing a comprehensive overview to guide future research and applications.
Maxime Manderlier, Fabian Lecron, Olivier Vu Thanh +1
We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can generate effective, user-facing explanations from a mathematically interpretable recommendation model. The model is based on constrained matrix factorization, where user types are explicitly represented and predicted item scores share the same scale as observed ratings, making the model's internal representations and predicted scores directly interpretable. This structure is translated into natural language explanations using carefully designed LLM prompts. Many works in explainable AI rely on automatic evaluation metrics, which often fail to capture users' actual needs and perceptions. In contrast, we adopt a user-centered approach: we conduct a study with 326 participants who assessed the quality of the explanations across five key dimensions-transparency, effectiveness, persuasion, trust, and satisfaction-as well as the recommendations themselves. To evaluate how different explanation strategies are perceived, we generate multiple explanation types from the same underlying model, varying the input information provided to the LLM. Our analysis reveals that all explanation types are generally well received, with moderate statistical differences between strategies. User comments further underscore how participants react to each type of explanation, offering complementary insights beyond the quantitative results.
Gejian Zhao, Hanzhou Wu, Xinpeng Zhang
Backdoor attacks pose a significant security threat to natural language processing (NLP) systems, but existing methods lack explainable trigger mechanisms and fail to quantitatively model vulnerability patterns. This work pioneers the quantitative connection between explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and backdoor attacks, introducing Sensitron, a novel modular framework for crafting stealthy and robust backdoor triggers. Sensitron employs a progressive refinement approach where Dynamic Meta-Sensitivity Analysis (DMSA) first identifies potentially vulnerable input tokens, Hierarchical SHAP Estimation (H-SHAP) then provides explainable attribution to precisely pinpoint the most influential tokens, and finally a Plug-and-Rank mechanism that generates contextually appropriate triggers. We establish the first mathematical correlation (Sensitivity Ranking Correlation, SRC=0.83) between explainability scores and empirical attack success, enabling precise targeting of model vulnerabilities. Sensitron achieves 97.8% Attack Success Rate (ASR) (+5.8% over state-of-the-art (SOTA)) with 85.4% ASR at 0.1% poisoning rate, demonstrating robust resistance against multiple SOTA defenses. This work reveals fundamental NLP vulnerabilities and provides new attack vectors through weaponized explainability.
Benedikt Kantz, Peter Waldert, Stefan Lengauer +3
We propose Parameter Space Analysis through Guided Visual Interpolations (ParamInter), a novel tool for high-dimensional input parameter space analysis by making interpolation towards optimal parameter sets explorable using guided analytics. The interpolation is accompanied by both small multiples in linked views and utilizes t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) representations to show an interpolation overview. ParamInter uses a guided exploration loop focusing on the interpolation towards user-specified target parameters from many output parameters. The exploration process is additionally guided through eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-based effect suggestions throughout our tool. ParamInter, compared to prior work, focuses on the integration of state-of-the art effect-based XAI and Uncertainty Quantification (UCQ) approaches for guidance, and introduces an interpolation towards the optimal solution through interpolation between the initial parameter setting and the optimal setting. We also add an interpretability layer for dimensionality-reduced data by displaying our novel interpolation towards the optimum, enhanced by small multiples of the input parameters on top. We demonstrate the direct applicability of our tool on a real-world use case for a blast furnace optimisation process, where a multi-objective problem is solved through modeling and visualisation.
Nitesh Kumar, Usashi Chatterjee, Steven Schockaert
Conceptual spaces represent entities and concepts using cognitively meaningful dimensions, typically referring to perceptual features. Such representations are widely used in cognitive science and have the potential to serve as a cornerstone for explainable AI. Unfortunately, they have proven notoriously difficult to learn, although recent LLMs appear to capture the required perceptual features to a remarkable extent. Nonetheless, practical methods for extracting the corresponding conceptual spaces are currently still lacking. While various methods exist for extracting embeddings from LLMs, extracting conceptual spaces also requires us to encode the underlying features. In this paper, we propose a strategy in which features (e.g. sweetness) are encoded by embedding the description of a corresponding prototype (e.g. a very sweet food). To improve this strategy, we fine-tune the LLM to align the prototype embeddings with the corresponding conceptual space dimensions. Our empirical analysis finds this approach to be highly effective.
Antoni Guasch, Maria Isabel Valdez
The "black box" nature of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) presents critical limitations in reliability and transparency, fueling the debate around the "illusion of thinking" and the challenge of state hallucinations in agentic systems. In response, we introduce The STAR-XAI Protocol (Socratic, Transparent, Agentic, Reasoning - for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence), a novel operational methodology for training and operating verifiably reliable AI agents. Our method reframes the human-AI interaction as a structured Socratic dialogue governed by an explicit, evolving symbolic rulebook (the Consciousness Transfer Package - CTP) and a suite of integrity protocols, including a state-locking Checksum that eradicates internal state corruption. Through an exhaustive case study in the complex strategic game "Caps i Caps," we demonstrate that this "Clear Box" framework transforms an opaque LRM into a disciplined strategist. The agent not only exhibits the emergence of complex tactics, such as long-term planning, but also achieves ante-hoc transparency by justifying its intentions before acting. Crucially, it demonstrates Second-Order Agency by identifying and correcting flaws in its own supervisor-approved plans, leading to empirically-proven, 100% reliable state tracking and achieving "zero hallucinations by design." The STAR-XAI Protocol thus offers a practical pathway toward building AI agents that are not just high-performing but intrinsically auditable, trustworthy, and reliable.
Filip Bialy, Mark Elliot, Robert Meckin
This paper offers a domain-mediated comparative review of 251 studies on public attitudes toward AI, published between 2011 and 2025. Drawing on a systematic literature review, we analyse how different factors including perceived benefits and concerns (or risks) shape public acceptance of - or resistance to - artificial intelligence across domains and use-cases, including healthcare, education, security, public administration, generative AI, and autonomous vehicles. The analysis highlights recurring patterns in individual, contextual, and technical factors influencing perception, while also tracing variations in institutional trust, perceived fairness, and ethical concerns. We show that the public perception in AI is shaped not only by technical design or performance but also by sector-specific considerations as well as imaginaries, cultural narratives, and historical legacies. This comparative approach offers a foundation for developing more tailored and context-sensitive strategies for responsible AI governance.
Yu-Kai Shih, You-Kai Kang
As smart tourism evolves, AI-powered chatbots have become indispensable for delivering personalized, real-time assistance to travelers while promoting sustainability and efficiency. However, these systems are increasingly vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where adversaries manipulate inputs to elicit unintended behaviors such as leaking sensitive information or generating harmful content. This paper presents a case study on the design and implementation of a secure retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) chatbot for Hsinchu smart tourism services. The system integrates RAG with API function calls, multi-layered linguistic analysis, and guardrails against injections, achieving high contextual awareness and security. Key features include a tiered response strategy, RAG-driven knowledge grounding, and intent decomposition across lexical, semantic, and pragmatic levels. Defense mechanisms include system norms, gatekeepers for intent judgment, and reverse RAG text to prioritize verified data. We also benchmark a GPT-5 variant (released 2025-08-07) to assess inherent robustness. Evaluations with 674 adversarial prompts and 223 benign queries show over 95% accuracy on benign tasks and substantial detection of injection attacks. GPT-5 blocked about 85% of attacks, showing progress yet highlighting the need for layered defenses. Findings emphasize contributions to sustainable tourism, multilingual accessibility, and ethical AI deployment. This work offers a practical framework for deploying secure chatbots in smart tourism and contributes to resilient, trustworthy AI applications.
Adam Nayak, Pierre Gentine, Upmanu Lall
Flood risk is correlated in space and time, challenging insurance systems that rely on diversification across assets. Financial instruments governing flood coverage are typically structured as 1 to 5-year contracts, exposing portfolios to climate-driven risk at interannual-to-decadal scales. Yet existing tools address climate risk either through seasonal forecasts extending only months or multidecadal projections misaligned with fiscal horizons, leaving a critical gap in actionable flood risk simulation. We introduce a multisite flood simulation framework combining attention-based analog retrieval with stochastic generation of multivariate flood frequency, intensity, and duration sequences. Applied to over 100 sites in the Mississippi River Basin, the model produces spatiotemporally coherent flood portfolios conditioned on interannual climate variability. Explainable AI attribution paired with wavelet analysis links simulated clustering to large-scale climate drivers, yielding physically interpretable flood clusters for portfolio-scale loss simulation. The framework provides plausible, out-of-sample flood risk catalogs for interannual-to-decadal insurance risk assessment and financial planning.
74% published 2023+
26
Avg
309
100+
18
1K+
6,810
Total
Excl. arXiv-only (2,998)