Research Papers

Decision trees are a popular machine learning method, known for their inherent explainability. In Explainable AI, decision trees can be used as surrogate models for complex black box AI models or as approximations of parts of such models. A key challenge of this approach is determining how accurately the extracted decision tree represents the original model and to what extent it can be trusted as an approximation of their behavior. In this work, we investigate the use of the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework to provide a theoretical guarantee of fidelity for decision trees extracted from AI models. Based on theoretical results from the PAC framework, we adapt a decision tree algorithm to ensure a PAC guarantee under certain conditions. We focus on binary classification and conduct experiments where we extract decision trees from BERT-based language models with PAC guarantees. Our results indicate occupational gender bias in these models.

The increasing integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into society necessitates robust defenses against vulnerabilities from jailbreaking and adversarial prompts. This project proposes a recursive framework for enhancing the resistance of LLMs to manipulation through the use of prompt simplification techniques. By increasing the transparency of complex and confusing adversarial prompts, the proposed method enables more reliable detection and prevention of malicious inputs. Our findings attempt to address a critical problem in AI safety and security, providing a foundation for the development of systems able to distinguish harmless inputs from prompts containing malicious intent. As LLMs continue to be used in diverse applications, the importance of such safeguards will only grow.

Data and metadata documentation requirements for explainable-AI-ready (XAIR) models and data in physics-based simulation technology are discussed by analysing different perspectives from the literature on two core aspects: First, the scope of the simulation; this category is taken to include subject matter, the objective with which the simulation is conducted, and the object of reference, i.e., the simulated physical system or process. Second, the artefacts that need to be documented in order to make data and models XAIR, and modelling and simulation workflows explainable; two CEN workshop agreements, MODA and ModGra, are compared for this purpose. As a result, minimum requirements for an ontologization of the scope of simulation artefacts are formulated, and the object-objective abstractness diagram is proposed as a tool for visualizing the landscape of use cases for physics-based simulation.

Ensuring Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) reliably avoids harmful behaviors is a critical challenge, especially for systems with high autonomy or in safety-critical domains. Despite various safety assurance proposals and extreme risk warnings, comprehensive guidelines balancing AI safety and capability remain lacking. In this position paper, we propose the \textit{AI-\textbf{$45^{\circ}$} Law} as a guiding principle for a balanced roadmap toward trustworthy AGI, and introduce the \textit{Causal Ladder of Trustworthy AGI} as a practical framework. This framework provides a systematic taxonomy and hierarchical structure for current AI capability and safety research, inspired by Judea Pearl's ``Ladder of Causation''. The Causal Ladder comprises three core layers: the Approximate Alignment Layer, the Intervenable Layer, and the Reflectable Layer. These layers address the key challenges of safety and trustworthiness in AGI and contemporary AI systems. Building upon this framework, we define five levels of trustworthy AGI: perception, reasoning, decision-making, autonomy, and collaboration trustworthiness. These levels represent distinct yet progressive aspects of trustworthy AGI. Finally, we present a series of potential governance measures to support the development of trustworthy AGI.

Deep learning models for pulmonary disease screening from Computed Tomography (CT) scans promise to alleviate the immense workload on radiologists. Still, their high computational cost, stemming from processing entire 3D volumes, remains a major barrier to widespread clinical adoption. Current sub-sampling techniques often compromise diagnostic integrity by introducing artifacts or discarding critical information. To overcome these limitations, we propose an Efficient and Reliable Framework (ERF) that fundamentally improves the practicality of automated CT analysis. Our framework introduces two core innovations: (1) A Cluster-based Sub-Sampling (CSS) method that efficiently selects a compact yet comprehensive subset of CT slices by optimizing for both representativeness and diversity. By integrating an efficient k-nearest neighbor search with an iterative refinement process, CSS bypasses the computational bottlenecks of previous methods while preserving vital diagnostic features. (2) An Ambiguity-aware Uncertainty Quantification (AUQ) mechanism, which enhances reliability by specifically targeting data ambiguity arising from subtle lesions and artifacts. Unlike standard uncertainty measures, AUQ leverages the predictive discrepancy between auxiliary classifiers to construct a specialized ambiguity score. By maximizing this discrepancy during training, the system effectively flags ambiguous samples where the model lacks confidence due to visual noise or intricate pathologies. Validated on two public datasets with 2,654 CT volumes across diagnostic tasks for 3 pulmonary diseases, ERF achieves diagnostic performance comparable to the full-volume analysis (over 90% accuracy and recall) while reducing processing time by more than 60%. This work represents a significant step towards deploying fast, accurate, and trustworthy AI-powered screening tools in time-sensitive clinical settings.

Human-machine teaming in medical AI requires us to understand to what degree a trained clinician should weigh AI predictions. While previous work has shown the potential of AI assistance at improving clinical predictions, existing clinical decision support systems either provide no explainability of their predictions or use techniques like saliency and Shapley values, which do not allow for physician-based verification. To address this gap, this study compares previously used explainable AI techniques with a newly proposed technique termed '2-factor retrieval (2FR)', which is a combination of interface design and search retrieval that returns similarly labeled data without processing this data. This results in a 2-factor security blanket where: (a) correct images need to be retrieved by the AI; and (b) humans should associate the retrieved images with the current pathology under test. We find that when tested on chest X-ray diagnoses, 2FR leads to increases in clinician accuracy, with particular improvements when clinicians are radiologists and have low confidence in their decision. Our results highlight the importance of understanding how different modes of human-AI decision making may impact clinician accuracy in clinical decision support systems.

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based systems offers benefits for various domains of the economy and society but simultaneously raises concerns due to emerging scandals. These scandals have led to the increasing importance of AI accountability to ensure that actors provide justification and victims receive compensation. However, AI accountability has a negative connotation due to its emphasis on penalizing sanctions, resulting in reactive approaches to emerging concerns. To counteract the prevalent negative view and offer a proactive approach to facilitate the AI accountability behavior of developers, we explore rewards as an alternative mechanism to sanctions. We develop a theoretical model grounded in Self-Determination Theory to uncover the potential impact of rewards and sanctions on AI developers. We further identify typical sanctions and bug bounties as potential reward mechanisms by surveying related research from various domains, including cybersecurity.

Synthetic datasets are important for evaluating and testing machine learning models. When evaluating real-life recommender systems, high-dimensional categorical (and sparse) datasets are often considered. Unfortunately, there are not many solutions that would allow generation of artificial datasets with such characteristics. For that purpose, we developed a novel framework for generating synthetic datasets that are diverse and statistically coherent. Our framework allows for creation of datasets with controlled attributes, enabling iterative modifications to fit specific experimental needs, such as introducing complex feature interactions, feature cardinality, or specific distributions. We demonstrate the framework's utility through use cases such as benchmarking probabilistic counting algorithms, detecting algorithmic bias, and simulating AutoML searches. Unlike existing methods that either focus narrowly on specific dataset structures, or prioritize (private) data synthesis through real data, our approach provides a modular means to quickly generating completely synthetic datasets we can tailor to diverse experimental requirements. Our results show that the framework effectively isolates model behavior in unique situations and highlights its potential for significant advancements in the evaluation and development of recommender systems. The readily-available framework is available as a free open Python package to facilitate research with minimal friction.

This paper introduces a novel XAI approach based on near-misses analysis (NMA). This approach reveals a hierarchy of logical 'concepts' inferred from the latent decision-making process of a Neural Network (NN) without delving into its explicit structure. We examined our proposed XAI approach on different network architectures that vary in size and shape (e.g., ResNet, VGG, EfficientNet, MobileNet) on several datasets (ImageNet and CIFAR100). The results demonstrate its usability to reflect NNs latent process of concepts generation. We generated a new metric for explainability. Moreover, our experiments suggest that efficient architectures, which achieve a similar accuracy level with much less neurons may still pay the price of explainability and robustness in terms of concepts generation. We, thus, pave a promising new path for XAI research to follow.

Brain development in the first few months of human life is a critical phase characterized by rapid structural growth and functional organization. Accurately predicting developmental outcomes during this time is crucial for identifying delays and enabling timely interventions. This study introduces the SwiFT (Swin 4D fMRI Transformer) model, designed to predict Bayley-III composite scores using neonatal fMRI from the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP). To enhance predictive accuracy, we apply dimensionality reduction via group independent component analysis (ICA) and pretrain SwiFT on large adult fMRI datasets to address the challenges of limited neonatal data. Our analysis shows that SwiFT significantly outperforms baseline models in predicting cognitive, motor, and language outcomes, leveraging both single-label and multi-label prediction strategies. The model's attention-based architecture processes spatiotemporal data end-to-end, delivering superior predictive performance. Additionally, we use Integrated Gradients with Smoothgrad sQuare (IG-SQ) to interpret predictions, identifying neural spatial representations linked to early cognitive and behavioral development. These findings underscore the potential of Transformer models to advance neurodevelopmental research and clinical practice.

A Brief Summary of Explanatory Virtues

Ingrid Zukerman

In this report, I provide a brief summary of the literature in philosophy, psychology and cognitive science about Explanatory Virtues, and link these concepts to eXplainable AI.

GPT versus Humans: Uncovering Ethical Concerns in Conversational Generative AI-empowered Multi-Robot Systems

Rebekah Rousi, Niko Makitalo, Hooman Samani +5

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) and large language models (LLMs) such ChatGPT has enabled the realization of long-harbored desires in software and robotic development. The technology however, has brought with it novel ethical challenges. These challenges are compounded by the application of LLMs in other machine learning systems, such as multi-robot systems. The objectives of the study were to examine novel ethical issues arising from the application of LLMs in multi-robot systems. Unfolding ethical issues in GPT agent behavior (deliberation of ethical concerns) was observed, and GPT output was compared with human experts. The article also advances a model for ethical development of multi-robot systems. A qualitative workshop-based method was employed in three workshops for the collection of ethical concerns: two human expert workshops (N=16 participants) and one GPT-agent-based workshop (N=7 agents; two teams of 6 agents plus one judge). Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. The results reveal differences between the human-produced and GPT-based ethical concerns. Human experts placed greater emphasis on new themes related to deviance, data privacy, bias and unethical corporate conduct. GPT agents emphasized concerns present in existing AI ethics guidelines. The study contributes to a growing body of knowledge in context-specific AI ethics and GPT application. It demonstrates the gap between human expert thinking and LLM output, while emphasizing new ethical concerns emerging in novel technology.