Grammarly's AI Expert Review Allegedly Used Journalists' and Authors' Names Without Consent
Description
Grammarly's Expert Review feature allegedly used a large language model to generate editing suggestions presented under the names of journalists, authors, and academics without their consent. A federal class action filed by Julia Angwin claimed the feature misappropriated identities for commercial gain and attributed advice the named individuals never gave.
Actors
Alleged Deployers
- grammarly
- superhuman
Alleged Developers
- grammarly
- superhuman
Harmed Parties
- julia-angwin
- journalists
- academics
- authors
- writers
- grammarly-users
- epistemic-integrity
Classification
Risk Domain
Malicious Actors & MisuseRisk Subdomain
4.3. Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation
MIT Risk Profile
Source
Related Incidents (Malicious Actors & Misuse)
View all →Female Students at Westfield High School in New Jersey Reportedly Targeted with Deepfake Nudes
Oct 2023
ChatGPT Was Alleged to Have Aided Planning of Florida State University Mass Shooting
Apr 2025
Ongoing Purported AI-Assisted Identity Fraud Enables Unauthorized Access to Western Companies by North Korean IT Workers
Research Papers on This Topic
How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs
AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents
Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack