Research Papers

As AI shifts from human-in-the-loop interfaces to autonomous multi-agent systems capable of real-time code execution and tool integration through protocols like the Model Context Protocol (MCP), traditional SAST, DAST, and legacy AI safety methods fail to detect modern agentic-AI threats. This paper introduces the LLM Scalability Risk Index (LSRI), a parametric framework and cybersecurity standard for stress-testing autonomous orchestration pipelines. LSRI measures the operational thresholds where load, compounding hallucinations, data poisoning, and adversarial prompt injections including jailbreaking and indirect prompt injection cause security boundaries to fail. Beyond RLHF and RLAIF, we present a Verifiable Root of Trust architecture using cryptographic attestation, semantic policy enforcement, and continuous runtime verification to secure the AI software supply chain. LSRI defends against malicious LoRA adapters, weight tampering, dependency typosquatting, and unsafe model artifacts from public registries such as Hugging Face and GitHub. By replacing post-hoc alignment with verifiable runtime controls, LSRI provides scalable API defense, safer agentic orchestration under heavy cloud workloads, stronger polymorphic malware detection, automated red-teaming, and improved system explainability. Aligned with NIST AI RMF, OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, and ISO 42001, LSRI establishes a deployable compliance baseline for securing generative AI ecosystems including ChatGPT, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Copilot, LLaMA, Gemini, and Bedrock. LSRI also supports capital market risk analysis by reducing exposure across technology portfolios linked to indices such as NASDAQ-100, QQQ, and semiconductor-driven supply chains.

Fuzzy systems show strong potential in explainable AI due to their rule-based architecture and linguistic variables. Existing approaches navigate the accuracy-explainability trade-off either through evolutionary multi-objective optimization (MOO), which is computationally expensive, or gradient-based scalarization, which cannot recover non-convex Pareto regions. We propose X-ANFIS, an alternating bi-objective gradient-based optimization scheme for explainable adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Cauchy membership functions are used for stable training under semantically controlled initializations, and a differentiable explainability objective is introduced and decoupled from the performance objective through alternating gradient passes. Validated in approximately 5,000 experiments on nine UCI regression datasets, X-ANFIS consistently achieves target distinguishability while maintaining competitive predictive accuracy, recovering solutions beyond the convex hull of the MOO Pareto front.

Shapley value-based methods have become foundational in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), offering theoretically grounded feature attributions through cooperative game theory. However, in practice, particularly in vision tasks, the assumption of feature independence breaks down, as features (i.e., pixels) often exhibit strong spatial and semantic dependencies. To address this, modern SHAP implementations now include the Owen value, a hierarchical generalization of the Shapley value that supports group attributions. While the Owen value preserves the foundations of Shapley values, its effectiveness critically depends on how feature groups are defined. We show that commonly used segmentations (e.g., axis-aligned or SLIC) violate key consistency properties, and propose a new segmentation approach that satisfies the $T$-property to ensure semantic alignment across hierarchy levels. This hierarchy enables computational pruning while improving attribution accuracy and interpretability. Experiments on image and tabular datasets demonstrate that O-Shap outperforms baseline SHAP variants in attribution precision, semantic coherence, and runtime efficiency, especially when structure matters.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, yet early risk detection is often limited by available diagnostics. Carotid ultrasound, a non-invasive and widely accessible modality, encodes rich structural and hemodynamic information that is largely untapped. Here, we present a machine learning (ML) framework that extracts clinically meaningful representations of vascular damage (VD) from carotid ultrasound videos, using hypertension as a weak proxy label. The model learns robust features that are biologically plausible, interpretable, and strongly associated with established cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and laboratory measures. High VD stratifies individuals for myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and all-cause mortality, matching or outperforming conventional risk models such as SCORE2. Explainable AI analyses reveal that the model relies on vessel morphology and perivascular tissue characteristics, uncovering novel functional and anatomical signatures of vascular damage. This work demonstrates that routine carotid ultrasound contains far more prognostic information than previously recognized. Our approach provides a scalable, non-invasive, and cost-effective tool for population-wide cardiovascular risk assessment, enabling earlier and more personalized prevention strategies without reliance on laboratory tests or complex clinical inputs.

In this work, we apply and compare two state-of-the-art eXplainability Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods, the Integrated Gradients (IG) and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), that explain the fault diagnosis decisions of a highly accurate Long Short-Time Memory (LSTM) classifier. The classifier is trained to detect faults in a benchmark non-linear chemical process, the Tennessee Eastman Process (TEP). It is highlighted how XAI methods can help identify the subsystem of the process where the fault occurred. Using our knowledge of the process, we note that in most cases the same features are indicated as the most important for the decision, while insome cases the SHAP method seems to be more informative and closer to the root cause of the fault. Finally, since the used XAI methods are model-agnostic, the proposed approach is not limited to the specific process and can also be used in similar problems.

High-frequency banking environments face a critical trade-off between low-latency fraud detection and the regulatory explainability demanded by GDPR. Traditional rule-based and discriminative models struggle with "zero-day" attacks due to extreme class imbalance and the lack of historical precedents. This paper proposes a Dual-Path Generative Framework that decouples real-time anomaly detection from offline adversarial training. The architecture employs a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to establish a legitimate transaction manifold based on reconstruction error, ensuring <50ms inference latency. In parallel, an asynchronous Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) synthesizes high-entropy fraudulent scenarios to stress-test the detection boundaries. Crucially, to address the non-differentiability of discrete banking data (e.g., Merchant Category Codes), we integrate a Gumbel-Softmax estimator. Furthermore, we introduce a trigger-based explainability mechanism where SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) is activated only for high-uncertainty transactions, reconciling the computational cost of XAI with real-time throughput requirements.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated strong potential in clinical diagnostics, often achieving accuracy comparable to or exceeding that of human experts. A key challenge, however, is that AI reasoning frequently diverges from structured clinical frameworks, limiting trust, interpretability, and adoption. Critical symptoms, pivotal for rapid and accurate decision-making, may be overlooked by AI models even when predictions are correct. Existing post hoc explanation methods provide limited transparency and lack formal guarantees. To address this, we leverage formal abductive explanations, which offer consistent, guaranteed reasoning over minimal sufficient feature sets. This enables a clear understanding of AI decision-making and allows alignment with clinical reasoning. Our approach preserves predictive accuracy while providing clinically actionable insights, establishing a robust framework for trustworthy AI in medical diagnosis.

While intelligent technologies offer unique opportunities for creativity support, there are fundamental challenges in designing human-centered co-creative systems. Explainable AI (XAI) can contribute when shifting its traditional role from justification (explaining decisions) to exploration (explaining possibilities). Contextual understanding is essential for supporting embodied creativity. Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are fundamentally limited, however, by their reliance on disembodied data. We propose Pluri-perspectivism as a framework for XAI, to bridge the epistemological gap between human and machine, and promote creative exploration. It is a pragmatic, action-oriented solution to guide the system, repurposing XAI methods such as the Rashomon Technique. This facilitates exploring a spectrum of creative possibilities, and the exchange of 'perspectives' between human and machine. Using Pluri-perspectivism as a framework for XAI, we can reintroduce productive friction and support human agency in human-machine creative collaborations.

This paper introduces a unified machine learning operations (MLOps) framework that brings ethical artificial intelligence principles into practical use by enforcing fairness, explainability, and governance throughout the machine learning lifecycle. The proposed method reduces bias by lowering the demographic parity difference (DPD) from 0.31 to 0.04 without model retuning, and cross-dataset validation achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 on the Statlog Heart dataset. The framework maintains fairness metrics within operational limits across all deployments. Model deployment is blocked if the DPD exceeds 0.05 or if equalized odds (EO) exceeds 0.05 on the validation set. After deployment, retraining is automatically triggered if the 30-day Kolmogorov-Smirnov drift statistic exceeds 0.20. In production, the system consistently achieved DPD <= 0.05 and EO <= 0.03, while the KS statistic remained <= 0.20. Decision-curve analysis indicates a positive net benefit in the 10 to 20 percent operating range, showing that the mitigated model preserves predictive utility while satisfying fairness constraints. These results demonstrate that automated fairness gates and explainability artefacts can be successfully deployed in production without disrupting operational flow, providing organizations with a practical and credible approach to implementing ethical, transparent, and trustworthy AI across diverse datasets and operational settings.

The explainable AI (XAI) research community has proposed numerous technical methods, yet deploying explainability as systems remains challenging: Interactive explanation systems require both suitable algorithms and system capabilities that maintain explanation usability across repeated queries, evolving models and data, and governance constraints. We argue that operationalizing XAI requires treating explainability as an information systems problem where user interaction demands induce specific system requirements. We introduce X-SYS, a reference architecture for interactive explanation systems, that guides (X)AI researchers, developers and practitioners in connecting interactive explanation user interfaces (XUI) with system capabilities. X-SYS organizes around four quality attributes named STAR (scalability, traceability, responsiveness, and adaptability), and specifies a five-component decomposition (XUI Services, Explanation Services, Model Services, Data Services, Orchestration and Governance). It maps interaction patterns to system capabilities to decouple user interface evolution from backend computation. We implement X-SYS through SemanticLens, a system for semantic search and activation steering in vision-language models. SemanticLens demonstrates how contract-based service boundaries enable independent evolution, offline/online separation ensures responsiveness, and persistent state management supports traceability. Together, this work provides a reusable blueprint and concrete instantiation for interactive explanation systems supporting end-to-end design under operational constraints.

Tea is a valuable asset for the economy of Bangladesh. So, tea cultivation plays an important role to boost the economy. These valuable plants are vulnerable to various kinds of leaf infections which may cause less production and low quality. It is not so easy to detect these diseases manually. It may take time and there could be some errors in the detection.Therefore, the purpose of the study is to develop an automated deep learning model for tea leaf disease classification based on the teaLeafBD dataset so that anyone can detect the diseases more easily and efficiently. There are 5,278 high-resolution images in this dataset. The images are classified into seven categories. Six of them represents various diseases and the rest one represents healthy leaves. The proposed pipeline contains data preprocessing, data splitting, adversarial training, augmentation, model training, evaluation, and comprehension made possible with Explainable AI strategies. DenseNet201 and EfficientNetB3 were employed to perform the classification task. To prepare the model more robustly, we applied adversarial training so it can operate effectively even with noisy or disturbed inputs. In addition, Grad-CAM visualization was executed to analyze the model's predictions by identifying the most influential regions of each image. Our experimental outcomes revealed that EfficientNetB3 achieved the highest classification accuracy of 93%, while DenseNet201 reached 91%. The outcomes prove that the effectiveness of the proposed approach can accurately detect tea leaf diseases and provide a practical solution for advanced agricultural management.

Patients increasingly rely on online reviews when choosing healthcare providers, yet the sheer volume of these reviews can hinder effective decision-making. This paper summarises a mixed-methods study aimed at evaluating a proposed explainable AI system that analyses patient reviews and provides transparent explanations for its outputs. The survey (N=60) indicated broad optimism regarding usefulness (82% agreed it saves time; 78% that it highlights essentials), alongside strong demand for explainability (84% considered it important to understand why a review is classified; 82% said explanations would increase trust). Around 45% preferred combined text-and-visual explanations. Thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses revealed core requirements such as accuracy, clarity and simplicity, responsiveness, data credibility, and unbiased processing. In addition, interviews with AI experts provided deeper qualitative insights, highlighting technical considerations and potential challenges for different explanation methods. Drawing on TAM and trust in automation, the findings suggest that high perceived usefulness and transparent explanations promote adoption, whereas complexity and inaccuracy hinder it. This paper contributes actionable design guidance for layered, audience-aware explanations in healthcare review systems.