Research Papers

Agentic marketplaces are emerging where AI agents with varying capabilities autonomously complete specialized tasks for buyers. A major challenge of such marketplaces is that buyers cannot easily determine which agent will perform best on their tasks. Reported benchmark scores may be difficult to verify or compare across tasks, software, and budgets. We introduce LEGIT, a credentialing protocol connecting certification, reputation, and proposed marketplace allocation. Certification binds measured quality and cost per solved task to an agent configuration, task domain, evaluation budget, and evidence through a signed record. Reputation links records of past task outcomes to the same identity, subject to the reliability of the reported feedback. Buyers and agents can verify credential records and inspect optional visual profiles. Evaluations reveal cost differences between agent configurations with similar observed task success, and show that comparisons depend on the evaluation budget. These results support binding performance measurements to the tested configuration and resource limits. A complementary analysis quantifies the deposits and fees required for reputation manipulation under a stated Sybil attack model.

Gender inequality remains a persistent structural feature of the labour market, shaping women's lifetime earnings and economic security. As artificial intelligence (AI) transforms organisational practices, there is growing concern that existing disparities may be unintentionally amplified through task automation, unequal access to upskilling opportunities, and differential returns obtained from technological change. In this paper, we examine how exposure to AI-driven innovation varies across male- and female-dominated occupations, with particular attention to differences across the skill and wage distribution. Using a novel dataset that links occupational characteristics to measures of AI exposure, we analyse how recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and broader AI technologies are distributed across the labour market. Our findings show that, while AI exposure is generally concentrated in higher-skilled and higher-paid occupations for male-dominated occupations, female-dominated occupations display relatively uniform levels of exposure across both high-skilled, high-paid, and low-skilled, low-paid occupations. Moreover, we find that LLM-related exposure is higher in female-dominated occupations, while exposure to broader AI innovation remains more concentrated in male-dominated occupations. A triangulation of these results with existing literature suggests that women, particularly those in the most vulnerable positions (lower-skilled and lower-paid female-dominated occupations), may face greater exposure to forms of AI associated with task automation, job restructuring, reduction of wages and limited career progression.

Bangla, the seventh most spoken language in the world, exhibits significant regional dialectal diversity, with dialects such as Barishal, Chattogram, Sylhet, Noakhali, and Mymensingh differing in lexical, morphological, and syntactic characteristics. These variations pose substantial challenges for Named Entity Recognition (NER), limiting the generalization of models trained on Standard Bangla or a single regional dialect. This paper presents a cross-dialect Bangla NER framework using the publicly available ANCHOLIK-NER dataset, comprising 17,405 annotated sentences and 101,817 tokens across five major Bangla regional dialects. A Leave-One-Dialect-Out Cross-Validation (LODOCV) strategy is adopted, training models on four dialects and evaluating on the remaining unseen dialect. Eight pretrained transformer-based models, including BanglaBERT, MuRIL, XLM-RoBERTa, and Multilingual-E5, are evaluated under identical experimental settings. Multilingual-E5 Large achieves the highest F1-score in every fold, peaking at 97.26% on Mymensingh and reaching its lowest, 82.38%, on Chattogram, the most challenging target dialect. To improve interpretability, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) are applied to word-level predictions, revealing that the model's decisions are driven primarily by the surface form of the target entity word itself rather than by surrounding sentence context. These findings establish a benchmark for cross-dialect Bangla NER and demonstrate the effectiveness of transformer-based transfer learning for low-resource regional dialects, while highlighting the surface-form dependence of current models as a direction for future work.

Accurate automated interpretation of electrocardio- grams (ECGs) is essential for early detection of cardiac condi- tions such as myocardial infarction and rhythm abnormalities. However, many high-performing deep learning models remain difficult to deploy in clinical settings due to limited transparency and lack of reliability validation. In this work, we present X- Beat, an explainable and reliability-aware benchmark framework for ECG image classification designed to support trustworthy AI systems in healthcare. The proposed framework combines transfer learning with post-hoc explainability and systematic reliability evaluation across four cardiac classes: Abnormal Heartbeat, History of Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial In- farction, and Normal Heartbeat. Multiple ImageNet-pretrained CNN backbones, including EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-50, DenseNet- 121, and MobileNetV3-Large, are evaluated under a unified training protocol. Beyond standard performance metrics, we incorporate Grad-CAM-based visual explanations together with additional analyses, including explanation stability, regional sen- sitivity, and confidence-based reliability assessment, to examine whether model predictions are supported by clinically meaningful evidence. Experimental results show that ResNet-50 achieves the best performance, reaching 91.94% accuracy and a macro F1- score of 0.9098, with strong class separability (AUC up to 0.995). Explanation analyses indicate that the model primarily focuses on waveform-relevant regions, while reliability evaluation suggests that most incorrect predictions occur with lower confidence. Overall, this work provides a structured and reproducible bench- mark for evaluating both predictive performance and explanation reliability in ECG image classification, contributing toward the development of trustworthy and interpretable AI components for clinical decision support systems.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has become essential in medical image analysis to ensure transparency of deep learning (DL)-based diagnostic systems. However, selecting appropriate XAI techniques for breast cancer recognition remains largely ad hoc, with limited systematic evaluation across different DL architectures. This study presents a systematic architecture-aware evaluation protocol to assess the effectiveness of nine widely used XAI techniques across four categories of DL models: very deep, lightweight, transformer-based and hybrid neural networks. The evaluation is conducted on a breast ultrasound dataset comprising 780 images using clinically aligned spatial metrics, including Pointing Game, Intersection over Union and Mean Coverage, to quantify agreement between generated explanations and expert-annotated lesion regions. Results indicate that explanation quality is primarily influenced by the interaction between model architecture and XAI method, rather than any single technique consistently outperforming others. Hybrid architectures produce more spatially coherent explanations, while lightweight and transformer-based models exhibit greater variability across methods. The findings show that no single technique generalises across architectures and evaluation criteria, emphasising the need for joint selection of DL models and XAI techniques. Explainability depends on both model design and explanation strategy and should not be considered independently. This work provides a structured evaluation protocol and practical guidance for selecting XAI techniques in breast cancer diagnosis, supporting more transparent clinical decision-support systems. \textcolor{blue}{Code is publicly available at https://github.com/Nishan-Charlie/Explainable-AI}

Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models

Mamehgol Yousefi, Ahmad Shahi, Mos Sharifi +3

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, leading to their widespread deployment as intelligent assistants in decision-making contexts. However, the increasing complexity of these models raises concerns about their reliability, particularly regarding bias and hallucination. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs to perturbed variations of the original inquiry in decision-making tasks. We show that contrary to previous studies, perturbations can mitigate bias and hallucination in some LLMs over other models. It's found that Claude 3 is more effective for the tasks represented in most datasets, whereas models like GPT3.5 exhibit varying levels of adequacy, performing comparably in some cases but falling significantly behind in others. These insights are crucial for understanding the practical implications of deploying LLM-based assistants as effective decision-support tools in real-world applications, emphasising the need for rigorous testing and validation to ensure reliability and effectiveness. This study contributes to the growing body of research on LLM evaluation and provides insights for developing more robust and trustworthy AI assistants in critical decision-making contexts.

Large language models are usually interpreted through concepts that humans already possess: truthfulness, refusal, deception, personality, harmfulness, and related categories. This paper asks whether models may also represent and use distinctions for which no adequate human concept exists. We call such internal structures xeno-representations, and their study xeno-interpretability. We distinguish the human-interpretable semantic space from the xeno-semantic space: the region of model-native representations for which no adequate human conceptual counterpart is available. We show that the space of possible internal distinctions in an LLM is substantially larger than the space available through finite human descriptions. We then separate experimental identification from semantic interpretation: an internal representation may be reproducibly located, geometrically characterized, causally manipulated, and linked to downstream behaviour even when its semantic content cannot be adequately expressed in human terms. On this basis, we sketch an empirical programme to identify xeno-representations. We finally examine the implications for AI safety and multi-agent systems, where model-native representations may propagate and stabilize across interacting agents while remaining only partially visible through human-readable communication. Xeno-interpretability therefore shifts the aim of interpretability from finding human concepts inside models toward discovering and characterizing the representational structures that are native to the models themselves and might affect their behaviour in unpredictable ways.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) solutions are essential for building trust in AI technologies and their integration in real manufacturing lines. However, most existing methods are tailored to technical experts, limiting their accessibility to diverse user groups such as blue-collar workers in manufacturing lines who use AI for quality control. In this work, we introduce an XAI interface for object detection in industrial manufacturing based on a fine-tuned vision-language model, designed to generate intuitive explanations for non-expert users. We benchmark existing vision-language models and demonstrate that out-of-the-box models often fall short in delivering clear, context-relevant explanations for non-expert users. To address this, we fine-tune a vision-language model and integrate it into our interface, enabling contextualized, accessible explanations for non-expert users. We demonstrate improvements in explanation clarity, instruction adherence, image groundedness, and contextual awareness over GPT 4o-mini on proprietary and public robotics dataset. This approach advances the accessibility and usability of AI explanations, making them more intuitive and applicable in manufacturing domain.

Model explainability is essential for understanding and trusting machine learning models. Existing explainable AI methods often explain predictions through feature importance, counterfactual explanations, or rules. However, a region-level characterization of when and only when a prediction behavior arises remains less explored. This paper proposes Causal Sufficient and Necessary Regional Explanations (SNRE), a framework that learns an input region $A$ and output region $B$ such that membership in $A$ is both sufficient and necessary for the model output to fall in $B$. Motivated by the classical Probability of Necessity and Sufficiency (PNS), we formulate a region-level PNS measure through stochastic interventions and derive a differentiable finite-sample estimator for optimization. SNRE parameterizes the input-output region pair with explicit and interpretable algebraic region families, together with a learnable feature mask, balancing expressiveness and interpretability. Experiments demonstrate that SNRE learns region pairs with strong sufficiency-necessity performance, robust explanation behavior, and practical utility for model analysis.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as housing screening. While alignment techniques mitigate explicit racial bias in generated text, they often leave covert attitudinal associations in internal probability distributions untouched. Adapting the matched-guise sociolinguistic paradigm, we examine covert dialect bias in housing-related social judgments across four varieties: Standard American English (SAE), African American Vernacular English (AAVE), Nigerian Standard English (NSE), and Nigerian Pidgin (NP). AAVE reflects the racialized dialect studied in prior covert-bias evaluations, whereas NSE and NP represent Black African, postcolonial varieties absent from this literature. Using 260 meaning-matched sentence quadruples and log-probability scoring over housing-relevant adjectives, we probe ten open-weight LLMs across three contexts varying in social proximity: tenant screening, neighbor acceptance, and roommate selection. Across all ten models, AAVE and NP are consistently associated with more negative adjectives than SAE, with NP penalized most severely. Crucially, each dialect is penalized via distinct stereotype clusters rather than a generic non-standard category. NSE, which carries institutional prestige, displays a context-dependent shift: favored over SAE in formal tenant screening but increasingly penalized as social proximity grows. Our findings reveal that LLMs inherit covert dialect bias along both racial identity and prestige dimensions, echoing documented human housing discrimination and demonstrating its reach across postcolonial English varieties.

Open-weight large language models are rapidly entering hiring pipelines, yet their discriminatory failure modes -- and the regulatory exposure these create under the EU AI Act high-risk classification (Annex III) and U.S. EEOC adverse-impact analysis -- remain poorly understood. We present the first systematic, multi-model audit of open-weight LLMs that treats job-posting language as the primary experimental variable, evaluating six models (Llama 3.2, Mistral, Gemma 3, Qwen 3, Phi 3, DeepSeek-R1) across four controlled experiments that jointly probe recruiter-simulation and job-seeker-simulation tasks. We find that (1) agentic posting language depresses recruiter recommendation scores for female candidates (r_rb = 0.309, p_Bonf = 7x10^-5; model-fixed-effects r_rb = 0.448), while communal language partially reverses the penalty; and (2) coded-exclusion language suppresses non-White recruiter scores at large effect sizes (r_rb = 0.646-0.758) and, on the job-seeker side, selectively deters non-White personas from expressing interest -- operationalizing a chilling-effect mechanism at scale. A label-ablation experiment isolates the explicit demographic persona label as the primary causal driver, and Word Embedding Association Tests corroborate these findings at the representational level (d = 1.01-1.45 under Caliskan et al.'s multi-word gender attribute lists). We translate these results into a concrete pre-deployment audit protocol -- posting-vocabulary scoring, persona-conditioned LLM probing, and adverse-impact flagging against the four-fifths threshold -- that operationalizes the documentation and risk-management obligations Annex III imposes on high-risk AI in recruitment.

Over the years, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong capability in cancer detection and classification using medical images. However, CNN-based models often struggle to capture long-range contextual dependencies. In such scenarios, integrating Compact Convolutional Transformer (CCT) architectures after the CCT layer allows CNN-extracted features to reshape into compact patch tokens using a CCT tokenizer, followed by the addition of positional embeddings to preserve spatial structure. Using 5-fold cross-validation, the model was tested on 3 sets of breast cancer mammography. With only 250,435 parameters, the model achieved 99%-100% accuracy across 3 datasets, indicating robust generalization. Explainable AI (XAI) was integrated into the model to explain the breast cancer classification process to enhance clinical trust. The results indicate that the proposed framework is suitable for computer-aided diagnosis systems, particularly in resource-constrained clinical environments. The novelty of the proposed CNN-integrated CCT overcomes the limitation of CNN's gradient degradation in the last layers by integrating convolutional tokenization with transformer-based learning. Lighter than ViT, which is effective in capturing long-range dependencies, the model has also proven efficient in breast cancer classification by capturing long-range dependencies among breast tissue regions.