Research Papers

TRIPROBE: Probing Task Separability Beyond Classification for XAI

Amirhossein Sadough, Freek Hens, Aleksa Bokšan +2

Modern evaluation of learning pipelines often reduces to downstream accuracy, leaving open the question of why tasks succeed or fail. TriProbe addresses this gap with a multi-level probing framework for explainable diagnosis of task separability. Rather than treating models as black boxes, TriProbe traces how separability evolves across inputs, learned features, and final classifiers. It decomposes multi-task problems into binary subtasks and applies three complementary probes: a Foundational Probe on input spaces, a Latent Probe on feature representations, and a Final Probe on classifier outputs. Using Maximum Fisher's Discriminant Ratio as a principled separability metric, TriProbe identifies bottlenecks and affected task pairs. Experiments on the Roshambo sEMG benchmark show how TriProbe reveals hidden breakdowns, guiding data collection, validation, and architecture design.

This research addresses the challenge of limited material recycling in wood recycling processes by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI)-based dimensionality reduction. Our study explores the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in multi-channel hyperspectral imaging (HSI), extending beyond RGB channels to over 200 spectral channels. Dimensionality reduction within this context involves streamlining the feature space for AI system training and inference. Focusing on explainable AI (XAI) methods, this paper contributes to a broader research initiative, presenting a solution framework that enhances the sustainability and efficiency of wood recycling processes.

More than 80 countries have reported malaria cases with 610 thousand deaths and are projected to increase. Identifying malaria early and accurately helps save lives and effective way to diagnose malaria is through microscopic methods that are labor intensive and require experts with special equipment. Deep learning (DL) has shown promising results in medical diagnosis. Here, we explored various DL models: ResNet18, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B2, VGG19 and proposed model ResNet18+TTA (ResNet18 backbone with modified classification head and test time augmentation) for detecting malaria presence using blood smears taken from the NIH Malaria dataset. Our experiment shows MobileNetV2 achieved 96.85 % accuracy with smallest model size (8.49 MB) and fastest inference (1.35 ms). The ResNet18+TTA model achieved 97.96 % accuracy, 0.996 AUC with longest inference time (13.32 ms). Larger architecture outputs a larger model size with moderate accuracy. Upon further pruning, ResNet18+TTA model gained a slight improvement in accuracy and reduced inference time. GRAD-CAM, SHAP and LIME provide explainable AI (XAI) insights into model predictions, using explanation agreement and divergence to evaluate predictive reliability.

Machine learning (ML) has become the dominant approach for network traffic classification, achieving very high predictive performance. However, a model is only valuable if it learns semantically meaningful and trustworthy patterns rather than exploiting spurious correlations. Conventional evaluation practices predominantly assess predictive performance. Consequently, whether the model relies on semantically meaningful patterns remains unknown. To address these challenges, we adapt the knowledge generation framework for network traffic classification. The adapted framework combines data, ML models, explainability, visualization, and expert reasoning to support the iterative exploration, verification, and refinement of model behavior and data preprocessing. The framework is grounded in findings from the literature, benchmark dataset analyses, practical experience with XAI-based traffic classification, and expert feedback, providing practical guidance for semantic model validation. By complementing predictive performance with semantic validation and human expertise, the proposed framework supports the development of network traffic classification models that are not only accurate but also robust and trustworthy.

AI systems have begun to report solutions, disproofs, and substantive advances on long-standing mathematical problems, raising questions about whether they approach research in the same way as mathematicians. This study compares public AI research accounts with the human literature on 11 such problems. The human corpus contains 58 papers that directly addressed the same mathematical targets later reported by AI sources as resolved, disproved, or substantially advanced; 31 within-problem comparisons were constructed from these materials. Six validated text-based measures capture problem resolution, method articulation, uncertainty and boundary specification, successor-question generation, generality, and cross-disciplinary integration. AI accounts place greater emphasis on resolving the focal problem and connecting ideas across fields. Human papers devote significantly more attention to explaining methods, specifying assumptions and limitations, and identifying questions for subsequent research. No precise difference is detected in generality. The estimated directions remain unchanged when each mathematical problem is removed in turn. The findings reveal two distinct research profiles: AI accounts concentrate on closing and recombining problems, whereas mathematical papers more extensively document the procedures, limits, and research opportunities through which results become cumulative knowledge. Evaluating research AI therefore requires attention to the organization of inquiry, not only whether a target is solved.

Online mental health communities thrive on peer support, yet those who volunteer to help often lack formal training and may struggle to articulate supportive responses. AI co-writing could lower this barrier; however, peer support derives much of its value from being perceived as personal, raising questions around authorship, ownership, and trust. We built PeerPen, a writing assistance tool embedded within a Reddit-like interface, supporting two main features: draft generation and revision of user-written responses. Through semi-structured interviews with 15 participants, we find that PeerPen reduced the burden of composing responses and increased confidence in offering support. Participants wanted AI to assist their writing without taking over authorship and anticipated tensions around authenticity and trust. Such assistance could make authorship uncertain even for responses written without it, weakening trust across the community. We contribute design implications for AI writing assistance that scaffolds supportive communication, preserves authorship, and accounts for community-level trust.

Interpreting hierarchical organisation of speaker embeddings

Yanze Xu, Wenwu Wang, Mark D. Plumbley

Speaker recognition neural networks recognise speaker identities from input utterances by learning latent representations (i.e. speaker embeddings). However, these networks' internal mechanisms remain largely opaque, motivating research in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to understand them. Existing studies have analysed how speaker embeddings are organised, but rarely frame these analyses within XAI. This work proposes to explain and interpret the organisation of speaker embeddings from an XAI perspective. To this end, we apply a hierarchical clustering algorithm, Single-Linkage Clustering (SLINK), to analyse whether our prepared speaker embeddings naturally form clusters with hierarchical relationships. The resulting hierarchical organisation (i.e. hierarchical clusters) is evaluated using the Cluster-Class Matching (CCM) method. Moreover, we propose a new method, termed Hierarchical Cluster-Class Matching (HCCM), to identify which hierarchical clusters best match individual semantic classes like male and conjunctive semantic classes like UK & male, thereby interpreting the clusters using their matched classes. We quantify the matching degree with a new metric called the L-score, which makes imperfect matches diagnosable. HCCM's results reveal that the hierarchical clusters analysed by SLINK are well interpreted using classes related to speaker identity, gender, and nationality, showing the semantics inside the hierarchical organisation of the examined speaker embeddings.

Botto is often described as a decentralized autonomous artist, but its authorship cannot be located in image generation alone. This paper examines Botto as an agentic curatorial system in which generation, ranking, voting, feedback, and minting form a recursive loop. Drawing on Botto's documentation and prior accounts of the project, we argue that agency in Botto is distributed but asymmetrical: community participants influence artistic direction through voting and governance, while Botto's internal models structure which images become visible, selectable, and recognizable as works. The case shows that, for AI art systems, explainability should include not only model behavior but also the curatorial procedures through which outputs acquire artistic status.

Diversified and Perceptible Counterfactual Examples Leveraging Expert Knowledge

Akram Bensalem, Fahima Djelil, Marie-Jeanne Lesot +1

CounterFactual Examples (CFEs) are a cornerstone of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), offering local, post hoc, and model-agnostic explanations by identifying minimal input modifications that alter a model's prediction. Yet, in order to be intelligible, these modifications must also be semantically meaningful to the explainee. This paper proposes to integrate knowledge expressed as a fuzzy linguistic vocabulary to represent the explainee's perception and interpretation of the data. The domain induced by this fuzzy vocabulary imposes structural constraints that make the features dependent, preventing the use of gradient-based optimisation methods for CFE generation, e.g., DiCE. The paper proposes a continuous data embedding in this linguistic domain and exploits it to define a variant of DiCE that allows personalisation for the explainee, named DiCEf. As illustrated by experimental results on a real-world dataset, this extension of the DiCE method enables the generation of CFEs that are linguistically perceptible while preserving cost minimality, sparsity, and diversity.

This study explores the use of deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and define effective biomarkers across five different stages of disease development using a transcriptomic biomarker HCC dataset constructed via semi-supervised learning from three source datasets. Several deep learning experiments were conducted with different feature extraction techniques and gene sets to identify the most effective features for training high-accuracy models with minimal loss. The best-performing model, using 15 selected genes with the SelectKBest algorithm, achieved 90.74% accuracy, while the model with the lowest recorded loss of 0.3187 was obtained using 20 selected genes. To address the issue of class imbalance in the dataset, a weighted training approach was conducted, and for model transparency and interpretability a SHAP-based XAI analysis provided insights into the model's decision-making, consistently finding DNAJB14 as the most influential gene. Functional validation in this study has provided compelling evidence that DNAJB14 plays an important role in the adverse properties of HCC and that its inhibition effectively reverses tumour cell migration, invasion, colony and sphere formation. The main limitation of this study is the dataset's class imbalance, and while weighted training helped mitigate this, further research and additional data are needed to guarantee model generalizability. Future studies should also explore the influence of genetic variations, environmental factors, and clinical differences on model performance across diverse populations.

AI-driven automated decision-making requires both predictive performance and interpretability. Recent advances in interpretable machine learning (IML) provide tools for explaining model predictions, but the technical complexity of these explanations may hinder accessibility to non-experts. To address this challenge, this study integrates data storytelling with IML to enhance the explainability of AI-generated decisions for a broader audience. Following the design science research (DSR) paradigm, this study proposes a formal definition of data storytelling in IML, introduces the DIST Pyramid to align data storytelling with IML, and presents the I-P-O Model to describe their interactions. It further develops an architecture to explain AI decisions through distinct "What-if" and "Why-not" event-generation processes. The architecture also employs data desensitization to protect sensitive input data. To validate the approach, a case study is conducted with the Boston Housing dataset, using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and large language models (LLMs) to generate data stories with And-But-Therefore (ABT) structures. An empirical evaluation shows that 76.4% and 74.3% of respondents rated the "What-if" and "Why-not" data stories as more comprehensible, with significantly higher accessibility scores than traditional SHAP visualizations. The paper concludes with the presentation of a narrative interpretation framework that integrates IML and data storytelling, thereby expanding the research scope as well as the practical applicability of AI decision-making.

The current trend of digitalisation has revolutionised the organisation of work and the way it is measured and performed across the globe, with AI becoming more common for managing labour and performance, as well as employee communication. In African organisations, where there is increasing adoption of remote work, hybrid models of work, digital collaboration, and data-based HR management, the notion of silent quitting has become more relevant, defined as worker disengagement when employees are still doing their job but do not put any effort into achieving good performance and exhibiting any emotion. This paper investigates how AI-driven feedback mechanisms, including sentiment analysis systems, pulse surveys, chatbots, engagement dashboards, and predictive analytics, are changing African workplaces through offering continuous listening, instant performance information and proactive engagement with employees. The study also explores how AI can assist organisations in identifying early disengagement and enable intervention and better employee communication in both private and public sector organisations in Africa. At the same time, we address the challenges of socioeconomic development and governance posed by AI implementation in developing countries, including digital inequality, infrastructure shortcomings, privacy concerns, algorithmic bias, and the risk of workplace surveillance. By situating silent quitting within wider debates on digital labour and automation, the paper contributes an African-centred perspective to discussions on the future of work and offers practical recommendations for HR professionals, managers, policymakers, and technology developers seeking responsible, context-sensitive approaches to workplace transformation across the continent.