Research Papers

The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented opportunities and challenges for journalism, fact-checking and media regulation. While AI offers tools to combat disinformation and enhance media practices, its unregulated use and associated risks necessitate clear policies and collaborative efforts. This policy paper explores the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for journalism and fact-checking, with a focus on addressing disinformation and fostering responsible AI integration. Using Germany and Ukraine as key case studies, it identifies the challenges posed by disinformation, proposes regulatory and funding strategies, and outlines technical standards to enhance AI adoption in media. The paper offers actionable recommendations to ensure AI's responsible and effective integration into media ecosystems. AI presents significant opportunities to combat disinformation and enhance journalistic practices. However, its implementation lacks cohesive regulation, leading to risks such as bias, transparency issues, and over-reliance on automated systems. In Ukraine, establishing an independent media regulatory framework adapted to its governance is crucial, while Germany can act as a leader in advancing EU-wide collaborations and standards. Together, these efforts can shape a robust AI-driven media ecosystem that promotes accuracy and trust.

Generative AI is radically changing the creative arts, by fundamentally transforming the way we create and interact with cultural artefacts. While offering unprecedented opportunities for artistic expression and commercialisation, this technology also raises ethical, societal, and legal concerns. Key among these are the potential displacement of human creativity, copyright infringement stemming from vast training datasets, and the lack of transparency, explainability, and fairness mechanisms. As generative systems become pervasive in this domain, responsible design is crucial. Whilst previous work has tackled isolated aspects of generative systems (e.g., transparency, evaluation, data), we take a comprehensive approach, grounding these efforts within the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence produced by the High-Level Expert Group on AI appointed by the European Commission - a framework for designing responsible AI systems across seven macro requirements. Focusing on generative music AI, we illustrate how these requirements can be contextualised for the field, addressing trustworthiness across multiple dimensions and integrating insights from the existing literature. We further propose a roadmap for operationalising these contextualised requirements, emphasising interdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder engagement. Our work provides a foundation for designing and evaluating responsible music generation systems, calling for collaboration among AI experts, ethicists, legal scholars, and artists. This manuscript is accompanied by a website: https://amresearchlab.github.io/raim-framework/.

There is an overwhelming abundance of works in AI Ethics. This growth is chaotic because of how sudden it is, its volume, and its multidisciplinary nature. This makes difficult to keep track of debates, and to systematically characterize goals, research questions, methods, and expertise required by AI ethicists. In this article, I show that the relation between AI and ethics can be characterized in at least three ways, which correspond to three well-represented kinds of AI ethics: ethics and AI; ethics in AI; ethics of AI. I elucidate the features of these three kinds of AI Ethics, characterize their research questions, and identify the kind of expertise that each kind needs. I also show how certain criticisms to AI ethics are misplaced, as being done from the point of view of one kind of AI ethics, to another kind with different goals. All in all, this work sheds light on the nature of AI ethics, and sets the groundwork for more informed discussions about the scope, methods, and training of AI ethicists.

The so-called algorithmic bias is a hot topic in the decision making process based on Artificial Intelligence, especially when demographics, such as gender, age or ethnic origin, come into play. Frequently, the problem is not only in the algorithm itself, but also in the biased data feeding the algorithm, which is just the reflection of the societal bias. Thus, this `food' given to the algorithm have to be repaired in order to produce unbiased results for all. As a simple, but frequent case, two different subgroups will be considered, the privileged and the unprivileged groups. Assuming that results should not depend on such characteristic dividing the data, the rest of attributes in each group have to be moved (transported) so that its underlying distribution can be considered similar. For doing this, optimal transport (OT) theory is used to effectively transport the values of the features, excluding the sensitive variable, to the so-called {\it Wasserstein barycenter} of the two distributions conditional to each group. An efficient procedure based on the {\it auction algorithm} is adapted for doing so. The transportation is made for the data at hand. If new data arrive then the OT problem has to be solved for the new set gathering previous and incoming data, which is rather inefficient. Alternatively, an implementation of a smooth interpolation procedure called \textit{Extended Total Repair (ExTR)} is proposed, which is one of the main contributions of the paper. The methodology is applied with satisfactory results to simulated biased data as well as to a real case for a German credit dataset used for risk assessment prediction.

This paper introduces AIJIM, the Artificial Intelligence Journalism Integration Model -- a novel framework for integrating real-time AI into environmental journalism. AIJIM combines Vision Transformer-based hazard detection, crowdsourced validation with 252 validators, and automated reporting within a scalable, modular architecture. A dual-layer explainability approach ensures ethical transparency through fast CAM-based visual overlays and optional LIME-based box-level interpretations. Validated in a 2024 pilot on the island of Mallorca using the NamicGreen platform, AIJIM achieved 85.4\% detection accuracy and 89.7\% agreement with expert annotations, while reducing reporting latency by 40\%. Unlike conventional approaches such as Data-Driven Journalism or AI Fact-Checking, AIJIM provides a transferable model for participatory, community-driven environmental reporting, advancing journalism, artificial intelligence, and sustainability in alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the EU AI Act.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing emergency medicine by enhancing diagnostic processes and improving patient outcomes. This article provides a review of the current applications of AI in emergency imaging studies, focusing on the last five years of advancements. AI technologies, particularly machine learning and deep learning, are pivotal in interpreting complex imaging data, offering rapid, accurate diagnoses and potentially surpassing traditional diagnostic methods. Studies highlighted within the article demonstrate AI's capabilities in accurately detecting conditions such as fractures, pneumothorax, and pulmonary diseases from various imaging modalities including X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. Furthermore, AI's ability to predict clinical outcomes like mechanical ventilation needs illustrates its potential in crisis resource optimization. Despite these advancements, the integration of AI into clinical practice presents challenges such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for extensive validation across diverse settings. This review underscores the transformative potential of AI in emergency settings, advocating for a future where AI and clinical expertise synergize to elevate patient care standards.

OPTIMUS: Predicting Multivariate Outcomes in Alzheimer's Disease Using Multi-modal Data amidst Missing Values

Christelle Schneuwly Diaz, Duy-Thanh Vu, Julien Bodelet +7

Alzheimer's disease, a neurodegenerative disorder, is associated with neural, genetic, and proteomic factors while affecting multiple cognitive and behavioral faculties. Traditional AD prediction largely focuses on univariate disease outcomes, such as disease stages and severity. Multimodal data encode broader disease information than a single modality and may, therefore, improve disease prediction; but they often contain missing values. Recent "deeper" machine learning approaches show promise in improving prediction accuracy, yet the biological relevance of these models needs to be further charted. Integrating missing data analysis, predictive modeling, multimodal data analysis, and explainable AI, we propose OPTIMUS, a predictive, modular, and explainable machine learning framework, to unveil the many-to-many predictive pathways between multimodal input data and multivariate disease outcomes amidst missing values. OPTIMUS first applies modality-specific imputation to uncover data from each modality while optimizing overall prediction accuracy. It then maps multimodal biomarkers to multivariate outcomes using machine-learning and extracts biomarkers respectively predictive of each outcome. Finally, OPTIMUS incorporates XAI to explain the identified multimodal biomarkers. Using data from 346 cognitively normal subjects, 608 persons with mild cognitive impairment, and 251 AD patients, OPTIMUS identifies neural and transcriptomic signatures that jointly but differentially predict multivariate outcomes related to executive function, language, memory, and visuospatial function. Our work demonstrates the potential of building a predictive and biologically explainable machine-learning framework to uncover multimodal biomarkers that capture disease profiles across varying cognitive landscapes. The results improve our understanding of the complex many-to-many pathways in AD.

Bias from contrast injection variability is a significant obstacle to accurate intracranial aneurysm occlusion prediction using quantitative angiography and deep neural networks . This study explores bias removal and explainable AI for outcome prediction. This study used angiograms from 458 patients with flow diverters treated IAs with six month follow up defining occlusion status. We minimized injection variability by deconvolving the parent artery input to isolate the impulse response of aneurysms, then reconvolving it with a standardized injection curve. A deep neural network trained on these QA derived biomarkers predicted six month occlusion. Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations identified the key imaging features influencing the model, ensuring transparency and clinical relevance.

Interaction between humans and AI systems raises the question of how people understand AI systems. This has been addressed with explainable AI, the interpretability arising from users' domain expertise, or collaborating with AI in a stable environment. In the absence of these elements, we discuss designing Actionable AI, which allows non-experts to configure black-box agents. In this paper, we experiment with an AI-powered cartpole game and observe 22 pairs of participants to configure it via direct manipulation. Our findings suggest that, in uncertain conditions, non-experts were able to achieve good levels of performance. By influencing the behaviour of the agent, they exhibited an operational understanding of it, which proved sufficient to reach their goals. Based on this, we derive implications for designing Actionable AI systems. In conclusion, we propose Actionable AI as a way to open access to AI-based agents, giving end users the agency to influence such agents towards their own goals.

There are countless examples of how AI can cause harm, and increasing evidence that the public are willing to ascribe blame to the AI itself, regardless of how "illogical" this might seem. This raises the question of whether and how the public might expect AI to be punished for this harm. However, public expectations of the punishment of AI have been vastly underexplored. Understanding these expectations is vital, as the public may feel the lingering effect of harm unless their desire for punishment is satisfied. We synthesise research from psychology, human-computer and -robot interaction, philosophy and AI ethics, and law to highlight how our understanding of this issue is still lacking. We call for an interdisciplinary programme of research to establish how we can best satisfy victims of AI harm, for fear of creating a "satisfaction gap" where legal punishment of AI (or not) fails to meet public expectations.

In the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), argumentative XAI approaches have been proposed to represent the internal reasoning process of deep neural networks in a more transparent way by interpreting hidden nodes as arguements. However, as the number of layers increases, existing compression methods simplify all layers at once, which lead to high accumulative information loss. To compensate for this, we propose an iterative layer-by-layer compression technique in which each layer is compressed separately and the reduction error in the next layer is immediately compensated for, thereby improving the overall input-output and structural fidelity of the model. Experiments on the Breast Cancer Diagnosis dataset show that, compared to traditional compression, the method reduces input-output and structural unfaithfulness, and maintains a more consistent attack-support relationship in the Argumentative Explanation scheme. This is significant because it provides a new way to make complex MLP models more compact while still conveying their internal inference logic without distortion.

In this paper, we propose a new theoretical approach to Explainable AI. Following the Scientific Method, this approach consists in formulating on the basis of empirical evidence, a mathematical model to explain and predict the behaviors of Neural Networks. We apply the method to a case study created in a controlled environment, which we call Prime Convolutional Model (p-Conv for short). p-Conv operates on a dataset consisting of the first one million natural numbers and is trained to identify the congruence classes modulo a given integer $m$. Its architecture uses a convolutional-type neural network that contextually processes a sequence of $B$ consecutive numbers to each input. We take an empirical approach and exploit p-Conv to identify the congruence classes of numbers in a validation set using different values for $m$ and $B$. The results show that the different behaviors of p-Conv (i.e., whether it can perform the task or not) can be modeled mathematically in terms of $m$ and $B$. The inferred mathematical model reveals interesting patterns able to explain when and why p-Conv succeeds in performing task and, if not, which error pattern it follows.